-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       log:  /Applications/Stata/771ml2.smcl
  log type:  smcl
 opened on:  19 Jan 2004, 11:45:24


. . adotype norm1_lf ~/ado/personal/norm1_lf.ado:

program norm1_lf version 8.2 args lnf mu sigma quietly replace `lnf' = ln(normden($ML_y1,`mu',`sigma')) end

. . clear

. set obs 1000 obs was 0, now 1000

. g y = 5 + 2*invnorm(uniform())

. summ

Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- y | 1000 5.151726 1.981239 -1.025118 12.30185

. . ml model lf norm1_lf (mu: y=) (sigma:)

. . ml check

Test 1: Calling norm1_lf to check if it computes log likelihood and does not alter coefficient vector... Passed.

Test 2: Calling norm1_lf again to check if the same log likelihood value is returned... Passed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The initial values are not feasible. This may be because the initial values have been chosen poorly or because there is an error in norm1_lf and it always returns missing no matter what the parameter values.

Stata is going to use ml search to find a feasible set of initial values. If norm1_lf is broken, this will not work and you will have to press Break to make ml search stop.

Searching... initial: log likelihood = -<inf> (could not be evaluated) searching for feasible values + feasible: log likelihood = -51345.658 improving initial values ++.....+.. improve: log likelihood = -3189.7239 rescaling entire vector +. rescale: log likelihood = -2700.2107 rescaling equations .+.+. rescaling equations .... rescale eq: log likelihood = -2133.2971

restarting tests... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test 1: Calling norm1_lf to check if it computes log likelihood and does not alter coefficient vector... Passed.

Test 2: Calling norm1_lf again to check if the same log likelihood value is returned... Passed.

Test 3: Calling norm1_lf to check if 1st derivatives are computed... test not relevant for method lf.

Test 4: Calling norm1_lf again to check if the same 1st derivatives are returned... test not relevant for method lf.

Test 5: Calling norm1_lf to check if 2nd derivatives are computed... test not relevant for method lf.

Test 6: Calling norm1_lf again to check if the same 2nd derivatives are returned... test not relevant for method lf.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Searching for alternate values for the coefficient vector to verify that norm1_lf returns different results when fed a different coefficient vector:

Searching... initial: log likelihood = -<inf> (could not be evaluated) searching for feasible values +

feasible: log likelihood = -3139.7497 improving initial values ++........ improve: log likelihood = -2894.5125

continuing with tests... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test 7: Calling norm1_lf to check log likelihood at the new values... Passed.

Test 8: Calling norm1_lf requesting 1st derivatives at the new values... test not relevant for method lf.

Test 9: Calling norm1_lf requesting 2nd derivatives at the new values... test not relevant for method lf.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ norm1_lf HAS PASSED ALL TESTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test 10: Does norm1_lf produce unanticipated output? This is a minor issue. Stata has been running norm1_lf with all output suppressed. This time Stata will not suppress the output. If you see any unanticipated output, you need to place quietly in front of some of the commands in norm1_lf.

-------------------------------------------------------------- begin execution ---------------------------------------------------------------- end execution

. . ml maximize

initial: log likelihood = -2894.5125 rescale: log likelihood = -2262.0075 rescale eq: log likelihood = -2262.0075 Iteration 0: log likelihood = -2262.0075 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -2207.4767 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -2102.3896 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -2102.1607 Iteration 4: log likelihood = -2102.1607

Number of obs = 1000 Wald chi2(0) = . Log likelihood = -2102.1607 Prob > chi2 = .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- mu | _cons | 5.151726 .0626209 82.27 0.000 5.028991 5.27446 -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma | _cons | 1.980248 .0442797 44.72 0.000 1.893461 2.067034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. . ereturn list

scalars: e(rc) = 0 e(ll) = -2102.160687481517 e(rank) = 2 e(k) = 2 e(k_eq) = 2 e(k_dv) = 1 e(ic) = 4 e(N) = 1000 e(df_m) = 0 e(chi2) = . e(p) = .

macros: e(cmd) : "ml" e(chi2type) : "Wald" e(opt) : "ml" e(depvar) : "y" e(user) : "norm1_lf" e(crittype) : "log likelihood" e(technique) : "nr"

matrices: e(b) : 1 x 2 e(V) : 2 x 2 e(ilog) : 1 x 20

functions: e(sample)

. . log close log: /Applications/Stata/771ml2.smcl log type: smcl closed on: 19 Jan 2004, 11:47:09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------