Return-Path: Received: from corot.bc.edu (corot.bc.edu [136.167.2.209]) by monet.bc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA85854 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 13:23:49 -0400 From: maiser@efs.mq.edu.au Received: (from root@localhost) by corot.bc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with X.500 id NAA88394 for BAUM@MAIL1.BC.EDU; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 13:23:48 -0400 Received: from baldrick.ocs.mq.edu.au (baldrick.ocs.mq.edu.au [137.111.1.12]) by corot.bc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA59714 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 13:23:41 -0400 Received: from efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (efs1.efs.mq.edu.au [137.111.64.8]) by baldrick.ocs.mq.edu.au (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA25637 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 03:23:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from EFS1/SpoolDir by efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (Mercury 1.40); 2 Aug 98 03:22:23 GMT+1000 Received: from SpoolDir by EFS1 (Mercury 1.40); 2 Aug 98 03:22:17 GMT+1000 To: baum@bc.edu Date: Sun, 2 Aug 98 3:22:13 GMT+1000 Subject: Re: Message-ID: <47A906B5C9A@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au> From: "clecourt" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: fractionally integrated unit roots tests Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 12:44:56 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear all, I search how, in RATS, I could construct unit roots tests with a fractionally integrated process (in order to estimate the exponent d). I know that it refers to ARFIMA models Could you help me, please? Sincerely, C. LECOURT \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) ---------- End of message ---------- From: Karen Seto To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: unbalanced panels in RATS Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 09:24:05 -0400 (EDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 Hi, Does anyone have a procedure which allows RATS to estimate unbalanced panels? Currently I am using TSP to estimate them, but would prefer to keep my data in RATS. Many thanks in advance. Karen Seto ________________ Karen C. Seto Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Department of Geography Boston University 675 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, MA 02215 617-353-7554 (voice) 617-353-5986 (fax) ---------- End of message ---------- From: KHL2288@UTARLG.UTA.EDU To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Multivariate GARCH Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 15:15:31 -0500 (CDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 Dear RATS users, I am trying to estimate multivariate GARCH model using Rob Trevor's sample program. First, I'd like to know if it is possible to save residuals from the Maximum Likelihood Estimation as separate series. For example, with Linreg instruction we can save the residuals as a new series by giving the series name after the instruction: Linreg y / resid. So, If I am estimating a trivarite GARCH model, can I save the residuals for each dependent variables as 3 separateseries? My second question is about ROBUSTERRORS Option for the Maximize instruction. According to the RATS manual, I am supposed have different standard errors with the ROBUSTERRORS Option, but I had the same values of standard errors of the coefficient estimates with or without the ROBUSTERRORS Option. Would anybody help me out? Lastly, does anybody have a sample program for Multivariate GARCH paramerizationof Ding and Engle(1994; UCSD working paper), especially model 15 which is latelyused by Santis and Gerard(1997;JF)? Many Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Kyong Lee Dept. of Economics University of Texas at Arlington ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Multivariate GARCH Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 15:54:17 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) > Dear RATS users, > I am trying to estimate multivariate GARCH model using Rob Trevor's sample > program. First, I'd like to know if it is possible to save residuals from the > Maximum Likelihood Estimation as separate series. For example, with Linreg > instruction we can save the residuals as a new series by giving the series name after the instruction: Linreg y / resid. So, If I am estimating a trivarite > GARCH model, can I save the residuals for each dependent variables as 3 separateseries? This is already being done as part of the estimation process. Look closely at the log-likelihood function, which should be something like: FRML LOGL = $ H11(T)= H11F(T) , H22(T)=H22F(T) , H12(T)=H12F(T) , $ U1(T) = RESID1(T) , U2(T) = RESID2(T) , $ H = ||H11(T)|H12(T),H22(T)|| , $ U = ||U1(T),U2(T)||, $ %LOGDENSITY(H,U) Note the terms like "U1(t) = RESID1(t)". This stores the value of the residual formula 1 at entry T into the series U1 at entry T. This formulation is actually vital to the whole process, because it allows you to reference lagged residuals (using the series) in the variance formula without running into problems with self-referential formulas. For example, you probably have a variance formula that looks like: FRML H11F = VC11 + VA11 * H11{1} + VB11 * U1{1}**2 As a result of all this, once the estimation is complete, you'll have a set of series containing the final estimates of the residuals and the variances (e.g., U1, U2, H11, H12, etc.). > My second question is about ROBUSTERRORS Option for the Maximize instruction. > According to the RATS manual, I am supposed have different standard errors with > the ROBUSTERRORS Option, but I had the same values of standard errors of the > coefficient estimates with or without the ROBUSTERRORS Option. Would anybody help me out? Are you using the BHHH method? If so, ROBUSTERRORS alone has no effect (see page 14-155). Sincerely, Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: Marco Hell To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: fractionally integrated unit roots tests Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 23:18:25 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Comcity X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There are several ways to estimate the d from (1-L)^d of an ARFIMA-model: a) Geweke-Porter-Hudak-method Reference: Geweke and Porter-Hudak, "The Estimation and Application of Long Memory Time Series Models",Journal of Time Series Analysis,1983,page 221-238 b) Robinson's average periodogram long memory estimator Reference: Lobato and Robinson (1996), Average periodogram estimation method of long memory, Journal of Econometrics, 1993, 303-324 c) Robinson's gaussian semiparametric estimator Reference: Robinson,P.M.,1995, Gaussian Semiparametric estimation of long range dependence, Annals of Statistics 23, 1630-1661 d) R/S-analysis Reference: Lo,A.W. (1991): Long-term-memory in stock market prices; Econometrica 59, 1279-1313 You can find a zip-file with rats-procedures of a)-c) at http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-V/baum.fac.html in the net. Marco Hell Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel clecourt wrote: > Dear all, > I search how, in RATS, I could construct unit roots tests with a > fractionally integrated process (in order to estimate the exponent d). I > know that it refers to ARFIMA models Could you help me, please? > Sincerely, > C. LECOURT > \\\|||||/// > \\ - - // > ( @ @ ) > +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ > | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | > | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | > | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | > +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ > oooO ( ) > ( ) ) / > \ ( (_/ > \_) ---------- End of message ---------- From: David S Montgomery To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: fractionally integrated unit roots tests Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 14:27:58 -1000 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 You can find a procedure that will estimate an ARFIMA model on my home page at http://www2.hawaii.edu/~dmontgom. This procedure is based on Sowell. If you have any problems then let me know. Thanks, David Monatgomery On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, clecourt wrote: > Dear all, > I search how, in RATS, I could construct unit roots tests with a > fractionally integrated process (in order to estimate the exponent d). I > know that it refers to ARFIMA models Could you help me, please? > Sincerely, > C. LECOURT > \\\|||||/// > \\ - - // > ( @ @ ) > +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ > | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | > | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | > | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | > +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ > oooO ( ) > ( ) ) / > \ ( (_/ > \_) > ---------- End of message ---------- From: jtebeka@oddo.fr To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9f._:_Multivariate_GARCH?= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 09:13:04 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 I am looking for a copy of the paper of Ding and Engle(1994; UCSD working paper). Is there anyone who can help me ? Jacques. ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Wai Lee" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: R=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9f._:_Multivariate_GARCH?= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 08:13:42 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 --0__=cE1zbJe3BJqbrUIMwDBQGI7uZswD6kRjqQUCqsV5zBA4iaHnTpoN871D Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I believe that it will be more effective to write to the authors instead of to RATS-L. Anyway, Engle sent me a copy of the paper as well as papers coauthored with others some time ago upon receiving my request. The Ding and Engle was dated 1994, and I am not sure if there is a revised version, or published somewhere already. Feel free to email me directly if you do not get prompt response from the authors, and I will send a copy to you. W. Lee jtebeka @ oddo.fr on 07/02/98 03:13:04 AM Please respond to RATS-L@efs.mq.edu.au To: RATS-L @ efs.mq.edu.au cc: (Wai Lee) Subject: R --0__=cE1zbJe3BJqbrUIMwDBQGI7uZswD6kRjqQUCqsV5zBA4iaHnTpoN871D Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =E9f. : Multivariate GARCH = --0__=cE1zbJe3BJqbrUIMwDBQGI7uZswD6kRjqQUCqsV5zBA4iaHnTpoN871D Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I am looking for a copy of the paper of Ding and Engle(1994; UCSD working paper). Is there anyone who can help me ? Jacques. --0__=cE1zbJe3BJqbrUIMwDBQGI7uZswD6kRjqQUCqsV5zBA4iaHnTpoN871D-- ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Marc Bremer" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: How can I implement the Newey-West correction in RATS? Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 06:06:51 +0900 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Sirs: I would like to calculate the standard error of a times series with the Newey-West correction (for four lags). How might this be done in RATS? Would you suggest some references on this? Thanks in advance. Marc Bremer bremerm@ucla.edu ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Estima closed for holiday Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:14:51 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Dear RATS Users: Our offices will be closed Friday, July 3rd, for the July 4th holiday here in the US. We will re-open Monday morning, 9am Central time. Thanks, and have a great weekend. Sincerely, Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Christopher F Baum" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: fractionally integrated unit roots tests Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 09:45:10 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mulberry (MacOS) [1.3.3, s/n P020-300786-009] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Check out the GPH.SRC on Estima webpage. There are a broader set of tests for fractional integration, implemented as RATS procedures, on Statistical Software Components archive at http://ideas.uqam.ca/ideas/data/bocbocode.html Search for 'baum' on this page. Kit Baum SSC maintainer --On Wed, Jul 1, 1998 12:44 +0200 clecourt wrote: > Dear all, > I search how, in RATS, I could construct unit roots tests with a > fractionally integrated process (in order to estimate the exponent d). I > know that it refers to ARFIMA models Could you help me, please? > Sincerely, > C. LECOURT > \\\|||||/// > \\ - - // > ( @ @ ) > +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ > | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | > | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | > | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | > +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ > oooO ( ) > ( ) ) / > \ ( (_/ > \_) ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: about unit root testing Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 02:46:35 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS users, I appreciate the procedure URADF.src to perform ADF unit root test. However, there is a main drawback. It cannot adjust the usable obverations with the lagged terms such that the usable observation of every ADF regression is the same: cal 70 1 4 all 97:4 compute maxlag=20 set trend = t-(79:1-70:1) do i=1,maxlag linreq dx 79:1-(maxlag+1-i) 97:4 # constant trend x{1} dx{1 to maxlag+1-i} ... .... end do i (It is with reference to another example provided by Dr.Tufte and I feel thankful for his help here) Then, the usable observation for every ADF regression is always 76, from 79:1 to 97:4. Anybody knows how to amend URADF.src (the criterion of REDUCTION) such that the no. of usable observation would be kept constant, please?? Kevin Senior Lecturer in Economics, Hong Kong Shue Yan College ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Nesrin Okay" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Threshold models Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 15:31:23 +0300 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Alejondro, Ihave the same problem, I'll appreciate if you can send me anything you find. sincerely, Nesrin Okay, Ph.D. Bogazici University Management and Finance Dept. Bebek, 80815, Istanbul, Turkey ---------- > From: Alejandro Arrieta Herrera > To: RATS Discussion List > Subject: Threshold models > Date: 23 June 1998 Tuesday 11:15 > > Dear RATS users, > > I am interested in the RATS's programation of threshold models (TAR and > TARCH, mainly). Any help is welcome. > > Sincerely, > > Alejandro Arrieta ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: request for help Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 02:40:50 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS users, display 6/2 The answer is 3. But display 6/7 the answer is 0 But display 6/7.0 the answer is 0.85714 which is correct. Why does it appear like that? So, since %nobs = 70 not 70.0. As I type display 1/%nobs it must be zero. Anybody can tell me how to solve my problem, please?? Thanks a lot! Kevin Dept of Economics, HKSYC ---------- End of message ---------- From: Juergen Jerger To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: request for help Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:23:43 +0200 (MESZ) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 > > So, since %nobs = 70 not 70.0. As I type display 1/%nobs it must be > zero. Anybody can tell me how to solve my problem, please?? > display 1.0/%nobs will solve this problem ******************************************************************** Juergen Jerger Phone: +(0)761-203-2325 Universitaet Freiburg Fax: +(0)761-203-2405 Platz der Alten Synagoge email:jergerju@vwl.uni-freiburg.de 79085 Freiburg GERMANY ******************************************************************* ---------- End of message ---------- From: Pizzoli Paolo To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: (no subject) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 10:59:22 -0700 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: akros.pizzoli X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Estima wrote: > > Dear RATS Users: > > Our offices will be closed Friday, July 3rd, for the July 4th > holiday here in the US. We will re-open Monday morning, 9am Central > time. > > Thanks, and have a great weekend. > > Sincerely, > Tom Maycock > Estima > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | > | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | > | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | > | USA | estima@estima.com | > | | http://www.estima.com | > ------------------------------------------------------------ Please, could you cancel my e-mail address from your Rats Discussion List? Thank you very much. ---------- End of message ---------- From: John Kling To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9f?= . : Multivariate GARCHDate: Thu, 2 Jul Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 08:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Ding works for the Frank Russell Company in Tacoma, Washington. At 12:15 AM 7/2/98, you wrote: > > > >I am looking for a copy of the paper of Ding and Engle(1994; UCSD working >paper). Is there anyone who can help me ? >Jacques. > > > ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: request for help Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 01:22:55 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Juergen Jerger wrote: > > > > > So, since %nobs = 70 not 70.0. As I type display 1/%nobs it must be > > zero. Anybody can tell me how to solve my problem, please?? > > > > display 1.0/%nobs > will solve this problem > > ******************************************************************** > Juergen Jerger Phone: +(0)761-203-2325 > Universitaet Freiburg Fax: +(0)761-203-2405 > Platz der Alten Synagoge email:jergerju@vwl.uni-freiburg.de > 79085 Freiburg > GERMANY > ******************************************************************* Dear Dr. Jerger, Thank you. Kevin ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: request for help Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 12:58:05 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) > Juergen Jerger wrote: > > > > > > > > So, since %nobs = 70 not 70.0. As I type display 1/%nobs it must be > > > zero. Anybody can tell me how to solve my problem, please?? > > > > > > > display 1.0/%nobs > > will solve this problem > > See page 31 in Chapter 1 of the RATS manual for details on integer-valued vs. real-valued calculations. Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: M.Haroutounian@city.ac.uk To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: (Fwd) Neural Networks Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 12:55:52 +0000 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Dear Dear RATS users, I am a PhD student at City University in London. I am examining non-linear prediction of security returns with moving average rules. I want to use the single-layer feedforward network regression model with lagged buy and sell signals. Is it possible to use neural networks in RATS, and in case yes, could you, please, help me to find out the procedure. Thanx, Maria ---------- End of message ---------- From: Laurent Sebastien To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: FIGARCH Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 15:06:10 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear all, Does anyone have a procedure which allows RATS to estimate FIGARCH Models ? \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------+-----------------------------------------+ | Laurent Sebastien | | | Assistant | Tel: 0032 (0)4/366.31.26 | | FACULTE ECONOMIE, GESTION | Fax: 0032 (0)4/366.28.51 | | ET SCIENCES SOCIALES | MailTo: S.Laurent@ulg.ac.be | | UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE | http://www.egss.ulg.ac.be/Econometrie | +---------------Oooo---------+-----------------------------------------+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: (Fwd) Neural Networks Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 10:13:48 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) > > I am a PhD student at City University in London. I am examining > non-linear prediction of security returns with moving average rules. > I want to use the single-layer feedforward network regression model > with lagged buy and sell signals. > Is it possible to use neural networks in RATS, and in case yes, > could you, please, help me to find out the procedure. > Neural Network modeling is one of the new features that was added to RATS with Version 4.3. Further info is available on our Web site, or contact us if you have questions. Sincerely, Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: Simon.Van-Norden@hec.ca (Simon.Van-Norden) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Code for Unobserved Components Models? Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:59:27 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I want to estimate some simple state-space unobserved components models for US output, along the lines of Watson (1986). Does anyone have any procedures or examples of programs for this kind of thing? I think I want to somehow use KALMAN and MAXIMIZE, but I'm not really sure how to approach the problem. Thanks SvN -- Simon van Norden Professeur invité simon.van-norden@hec.ca or svn@alum.mit.edu or http://www.hec.ca/~p280 (514)340-6781 or fax (514)340-5632 or cell (514)993-0466 Service de l'enseignement de la finance, Ecole des H.E.C. 3000 Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal QC, CANADA H3T 2A7 ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: [Fwd: Code for Unobserved Components Models?] Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 12:06:43 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6AA9EBB2308" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------6AA9EBB2308 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATs users, I have similar problems as Prof. Van-Norde. If anybody has any procedures or method for estimation, could you be kind enough to send me a copy, please?? Thank you. Kai-yin Woo Senior Lecturer, Dept of Economics, Hong Kong Shue Yan College --------------6AA9EBB2308 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au (sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au [137.111.1.11]) by silver.hkabc.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA06793 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 03:05:17 +0800 (HKT) Received: from efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (efs1.efs.mq.edu.au [137.111.64.8]) by sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA00212; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 05:02:51 +1000 (EST) Received: from EFS1/SpoolDir by efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (Mercury 1.21); 10 Jul 98 05:02:18 GMT+1000 Received: from SpoolDir by EFS1 (Mercury 1.30); 10 Jul 98 04:58:43 GMT+1000 From: Simon.Van-Norden@hec.ca (Simon.Van-Norden) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Code for Unobserved Components Models? Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 14:59:27 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2541C1548A2@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by silver.hkabc.net id MAA29893 I want to estimate some simple state-space unobserved components models for US output, along the lines of Watson (1986). Does anyone have any procedures or examples of programs for this kind of thing? I think I want to somehow use KALMAN and MAXIMIZE, but I'm not really sure how to approach the problem. Thanks SvN -- Simon van Norden Professeur invit=E9 simon.van-norden@hec.ca or svn@alum.mit.edu or http://www.hec.ca/~p280 (514)340-6781 or fax (514)340-5632 or cell (514)993-0466 Service de l'enseignement de la finance, Ecole des H.E.C. 3000 Cote-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal QC, CANADA H3T 2A7 --------------6AA9EBB2308-- ---------- End of message ---------- From: "clecourt" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: test of iid : test of Brock, Dechert and Scheinkman (B.D.S, 1987) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 11:20:42 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear all, Does anyone have a procedure which allows RATS to estimate this type of test? Thanks, Christelle. \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) ---------- End of message ---------- From: "David R.Tufte" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE: test of iid : test of Brock, Dechert and Scheinkman (B.D.S, 19 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 13:30:09 -0500 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BDAC12.2A330F20" Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDAC12.2A330F20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, but there is batch program written in BASIC available. I could e-mail it to you. Somewhere, I do have a program for generating Grosberger-Procaccio plots if you want that. David Tufte Assistant Professor Department of Economics and Finance University of New Orleans New Orleans, LA 70148 drtef@uno.edu (504) 280-7094 (504) 280-6397 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: clecourt [SMTP:clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr] Sent: Friday, July 10, 1998 4:21 AM To: RATS Discussion List Subject: test of iid : test of Brock, Dechert and Scheinkman (B.D.S, 1987) Dear all, Does anyone have a procedure which allows RATS to estimate this type of test? Thanks, Christelle. \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDAC12.2A330F20 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IgUTAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEEkAYAqAEAAAEAAAAQAAAAAwAAMAIAAAAL AA8OAAAAAAIB/w8BAAAARwAAAAAAAACBKx+kvqMQGZ1uAN0BD1QCAAAAAFJBVFMgRGlzY3Vzc2lv biBMaXN0AFNNVFAAUkFUUy1MQGVmcy5tcS5lZHUuYXUAAB4AAjABAAAABQAAAFNNVFAAAAAAHgAD MAEAAAAVAAAAUkFUUy1MQGVmcy5tcS5lZHUuYXUAAAAAAwAVDAEAAAADAP4PBgAAAB4AATABAAAA FwAAACdSQVRTIERpc2N1c3Npb24gTGlzdCcAAAIBCzABAAAAGgAAAFNNVFA6UkFUUy1MQEVGUy5N US5FRFUuQVUAAAADAAA5AAAAAAsAQDoBAAAAHgD2XwEAAAAVAAAAUkFUUyBEaXNjdXNzaW9uIExp c3QAAAAAAgH3XwEAAABHAAAAAAAAAIErH6S+oxAZnW4A3QEPVAIAAAAAUkFUUyBEaXNjdXNzaW9u IExpc3QAU01UUABSQVRTLUxAZWZzLm1xLmVkdS5hdQAAAwD9XwEAAAADAP9fAAAAAAIB9g8BAAAA BAAAAAAAAAK9UgEEgAEARwAAAFJFOiB0ZXN0IG9mIGlpZCA6IHRlc3Qgb2YgQnJvY2ssIERlY2hl cnQgYW5kIFNjaGVpbmttYW4gKEIuRC5TLCAgMTk4NykAphUBBYADAA4AAADOBwcACgANAB4ACQAF AB8BASCAAwAOAAAAzgcHAAoADQAdAAwABQAhAQEJgAEAIQAAADcxRTA3MjEyRjJBOUJEMTE4QTNE QkVGNTZFMTU0MERGAEQHAQOQBgB4BwAAIQAAAAsAAgABAAAACwAjAAAAAAADACYAAAAAAAsAKQAA AAAAAwAuAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAEAAOQDQyoHEMKy9AR4AcAABAAAARwAAAFJFOiB0ZXN0IG9mIGlp ZCA6IHRlc3Qgb2YgQnJvY2ssIERlY2hlcnQgYW5kIFNjaGVpbmttYW4gKEIuRC5TLCAgMTk4NykA AAIBcQABAAAAFgAAAAG9rDDEelAaE3wV5RHSixsAAAAAAAAAAB4AHgwBAAAABQAAAFNNVFAAAAAA HgAfDAEAAAAOAAAAZHJ0ZWZAdW5vLmVkdQAAAAMABhBXTgSiAwAHEEsDAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAABO TyxCVVRUSEVSRUlTQkFUQ0hQUk9HUkFNV1JJVFRFTklOQkFTSUNBVkFJTEFCTEVJQ09VTERFLU1B SUxJVFRPWU9VU09NRVdIRVJFLElET0hBVkVBUFJPR1JBTUZPUkdFTkVSAAAAAAIBCRABAAAANAQA ADAEAACnBgAATFpGdWrwp2N3AAoBAwH3IAKkA+MCAGOCaArAc2V0MCAHE48CgwBQAvIPWVRhaANx hQKDMg7ncHJxMg/2Jn0KgAjIIDsJbzI1ZjUCgAqBdWMAUAsDYwMAQQtgbmcxMDMzgwumB7BvLCBi dQVAZHRoBJBlIAQAGFBhKnQPcCATAG8JwGFtfCB3BRACQAnwGPADoEKAQVNJQyBhdgtwgwtgAmBl LiBJIAWgwHVsZCBlLQDAAxGjGjAYkG8geQhgLgqi+wqECoBTA3AH0BiyGEAb0NZkHQAPgHYY4GEZ hwIQPQXAZwnwBJAZQAuAZyAyRwNgc2IEkCBQci3KUANgYwDQY2kdAAtQ/G90BCAGkB0SGgAAcBiC HxlAHVsWdgLREKFzMTeUIEQbIGkcMFR1AYD6ZR1kQQQQBAABkCNBIbGaZgeQcwWwHWREZQqxTnQH gCNBJ3AgRQWgbrkDcGljBCAAcBwwRguA9QBwYyZFVQMAH0APoBow5nko4gfCT3IbkABxHWQDK7kY QExBIDcwMTQ0OB1qZAAgARBAdR0pUC4JgAxwHXkoNTCANCkgMjgwLS3ARDk0MA42MzklgCgwZmF4 KSPPEkQxNuEkKmxpMzYBQBmRGlCaYwVALTYSK/BpZyoR9QMgTSeRYSBQNhMdZjWkTzVxCxM1pAIA aS0t4DR7AUA1MDEw0AFADNA5s2KrKfADYToMg2IP4GMbkAMb8QAgIFtTTVRQ2jo71kAccgTwLi8w KvBKLTUwbBuQMi4DUF1/HWU64AZgAjA7RzsAJdBhenkYQEocECtgF1AYQDEAOTk4IDQ6MjElD/BN PrdUbztHUkHKVAXwRAQAY3UmwQIgxy2AJuE+uHViajXRO0dXGlAm8CjiaSXROkXnQv0hwWsYQChA D3AEkAVAKcIWU0fhC4BrA4IoQi6YRC5TGEBBETg3Mtd/OD85QjU0C7Yn9QrBB0Bs+iwn5W8HkQBw HSAgcB8ZfypQL4AY0R5gKYAZcE1hb/53BCBDIxzxRgEHcBlAGOB3GKAZAStQcBjgKPFF8j89HWRU D4BI0C1gHWRDaHsFECbwZT4xHVVJoFUUXLVVk3xV8i9WQFS/XEmgui1XoSBWXjKASaBAWTEKIDLV KzYTLW9PT2BvLShfKVpkNhEg11oFW/9dDysdZHxVEVQI7y2AO/VJoF6QQyixCXAEID8BAAfwR9NH 4UawVRFNRRRERSkQVF7AQURS/2IAXpJVYl5HVRIpJVRBVRVdXpBUVGBGsDpAMxMwKKAwKTg1LxXA LjCAHWZQNliHZLVeNlVOSWhWRVIa4FRiAGHxTOhJTExiAEkb0F6QHFD+TRtBRrA8zz3bZ5ZbnlqQ f22wXdRdH29PXctVFm2xT/9Y5FmGWKhZgFUSMKBWb3ITfTKAX1geVZBa0B1kE8EAAXdgAwAQEAAA AAADABEQAAAAAAMAgBD/////QAAHMHAHi6IwrL0BQAAIMHAHi6IwrL0BCwAAgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAA4UAAAAAAAADAAKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAQhQAAAAAAAAMABYAIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFKFAAC3DQAAHgAlgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAVIUAAAEAAAAE AAAAOC4wAAMAJoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwAvgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAADADCACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMAMoAIIAYAAAAA AMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAAAAAAHgBBgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAA AAAAAB4AQoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAeAEOACCAGAAAAAADA AAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgA9AAEAAAAFAAAAUkU6IAAAAAADAA00/TcAAJDK ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDAC12.2A330F20-- ---------- End of message ---------- From: bertrand gordon To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Expert in Cats for rats Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 19:14:09 -0400 (EDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear Rats Users, I am looking for an Experienced Cats For Rats User in the New York City Area [New York University; Columbia University ect.]. I have completed an article on the U.S. current account in which I Utilized the "Cats for Rats program". I am now in the process of looking for an experienced user of that program to reread and make comment or recommendations on my analysis, procedure and conclusion. Payment will be arranged. ---------- End of message ---------- From: bertrand gordon To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Expert in Cats for rats Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 19:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear Rats Users, I am looking for an Experienced Cats For Rats User in the New York City Area [New York University; Columbia University ect.]. I have completed an article on the U.S. current account in which I Utilized the "Cats for Rats program". I am now in the process of looking for an experienced user of that program to reread and make comment or recommendations on my analysis, procedure and conclusion. Payment will be arranged. Phone { 718 } 856-2008 ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Louis Gagnon, Ph.D." To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: RATS Graph into LaTEX Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 21:39:34 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Queen's University X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have had moderate success by capturing the image of the graph on srean with HyperSnap DX, retrievable from the TuCows site. The image can be saved in just about any graphics format and then imported into Word or other environments. The only limitation of this process is the image quality which is not a high as one would like. Hope this helps. Louis Gagnon Roman von Ah wrote: > Graphs from Rats > > Unfortunately you will get the same results with other programs. WinWord for > exple. lets you import just about any picture format. If you create any of > those formats with the help of Rats you will run into similar problems as > you observe with Latex. > > The only way I can deal with that is by: > - transforming Rats graphs into one of the provided other formats > - read those graphs into a specialized graphic-editing software > - save them under some image format it may actually be the same as provided > by Rats > - link the result into Winword (in your case Latex) > > Regards Roman von Ah > > arturo jose galindo wrote: > > > Hi everyone. > > > > I am trying to include a RATS graph in a LaTeX document, but I have been > > completely unsuccesful. LaTex, as far as I know, supports EPS, PS, BMP > > and WMF graphs, but even if I save the RATS graph as a EPS or a WMF I > > can't include it in the LaTeX document. The EPS files are simply not > > read. The WMF file is read, and the data appears nicely, but captions > > are completely messed up. > > I am including the graphs using the following LaTex command: > > > > \special{wmf: x=n y=n} > > > > Does any one have any suggestion? Thanks, > > > > Arturo Galindo > > Doctoral Student > > Department of Economics > > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > > Email: agalindo@uiuc.edu -- _______________________________________________________________________ Louis Gagnon, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Finance School of Business Queen's University Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6 Phone: (613) 545-6707 Fax: (613) 545-6589 http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~gagnonl ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: ASCII data Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:09:57 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS users, Anybody knows whether data in RATS format can be changed into data in ASCII??? I feel grateful if you could give me sincere help. Thank you. Kevin ---------- End of message ---------- From: ParisonC@bot.or.th To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE: ASCII data Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:09:31 +0700 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BDAE5F.7BAC2F90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes. You have to use Ratsdata. When you open ratsdata, you open the file. Then you select the series you want to export to ascii by highlighting. Afterwards, you select export and highlight Labelled ascii. > ---------- > From: WOO KAI YIN[SMTP:hkwoo@hkabc.net] > Sent: 13 =A1=C3=A1=AE=D2=A4=C1 2541 11:09 > To: RATS Discussion List > Subject: ASCII data >=20 > Dear RATS users, >=20 > Anybody knows whether data in RATS format can be changed into data in > ASCII??? I feel grateful if you could give me sincere help. >=20 >=20 > Thank you. >=20 > Kevin >=20 ------ =_NextPart_001_01BDAE5F.7BAC2F90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes.  You have to use Ratsdata. = When you open ratsdata, you open the = file.  Then you select the series you want to export to ascii by = highlighting.  Afterwards, you select export and highlight = Labelled ascii.


    ----------
    From:   WOO KAI = YIN[SMTP:hkwoo@hkabc.net]
    Sent:   13 = =A1=C3=A1=AE=D2=A4=C1 2541 11:09
    To:     RATS Discussion List
    Subject: =        ASCII data

    Dear RATS users,

    Anybody knows whether data in = RATS format can be changed into data in
    ASCII??? I feel grateful if you = could give me sincere help.


    Thank you.

    Kevin

------ =_NextPart_001_01BDAE5F.7BAC2F90-- ---------- End of message ---------- From: monia To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Expert in Cats for rats Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 08:27:15 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I m experienced user of Cats program for Rats. ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: ASCII data Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 10:43:35 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30) > > Anybody knows whether data in RATS format can be changed into data in > ASCII??? I feel grateful if you could give me sincere help. > You can read the data into RATS and then write it to a text file in any of several layouts using the COPY command and the appropriate FORMAT and ORG options. Sincerely, Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: Charlotte Mack To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: RATS Graph into LaTEX Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.30 > > arturo jose galindo wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone. > > > > > > I am trying to include a RATS graph in a LaTeX document, but I have been > > > completely unsuccesful. LaTex, as far as I know, supports EPS, PS, BMP > > > and WMF graphs, but even if I save the RATS graph as a EPS or a WMF I > > > can't include it in the LaTeX document. The EPS files are simply not > > > read. The WMF file is read, and the data appears nicely, but captions > > > are completely messed up. > > > I am including the graphs using the following LaTex command: > > > > > > \special{wmf: x=n y=n} > > > > > > Does any one have any suggestion? Thanks, > > > My method for using RATS graphs in LaTeX documents is simply to convert them to so-called ps files using GRAFEDIT. Notwithstanding what that program says, this is evidently eps. I then can use the file in my paper in the usual way for LaTeX, except that it might be necessary to rotate the picture to get it rightsideup. Hope this helps, ******************************************** Charlotte Mack University of Michigan -- Economics Dept. E-mail: cym@umich.edu ******************************************** On Sun, 12 Jul 1998, Louis Gagnon, Ph.D. wrote: > I have had moderate success by capturing the image of the graph on srean with > HyperSnap DX, retrievable from the TuCows site. The image can be saved in just > about any graphics format and then imported into Word or other environments. The > only limitation of this process is the image quality which is not a high as one > would like. > > Hope this helps. > > Louis Gagnon > > Roman von Ah wrote: > > > Graphs from Rats > > > > Unfortunately you will get the same results with other programs. WinWord for > > exple. lets you import just about any picture format. If you create any of > > those formats with the help of Rats you will run into similar problems as > > you observe with Latex. > > > > The only way I can deal with that is by: > > - transforming Rats graphs into one of the provided other formats > > - read those graphs into a specialized graphic-editing software > > - save them under some image format it may actually be the same as provided > > by Rats > > - link the result into Winword (in your case Latex) > > > > Regards Roman von Ah > > ---------- End of message ---------- From: Luca Cazzulani To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: unsubscribe Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 12:36:37 +0100 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Universita' Bocconi - Milano (Italy) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (16) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" unsubscribe ---------- End of message ---------- From: rkraeussl@wiwi.uni-bielefeld.de To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: unsubscribe Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 17:35:31 GMT+0100 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: Fak.WIWI, Uni Bielefeld X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 ---------- End of message ---------- From: M.Haroutounian@city.ac.uk To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Forecasting GARCH Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 11:42:43 +0000 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Dear RATS users, Can you help to find the way how to use FORECAST function (dynamic forecasting) with GARCH(1,1) model. Thank you, Maria ---------- End of message ---------- From: szuniga@entelchile.net (SERGIO ZUNIGA JARA) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE: Forecasting GARCH Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 10:36:58 -0300 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Maria: Look the following book respect arch-garch models with examples: WALTER ENDERS, "RATS HANDBOOK FOR ECONOMETRIC TIME SERIES", WILEY 1996 Regards, \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +--oOOo-(_)-oOOo-- +------------------------------------------+ | Sergio Zuniga | U. Catolica de Norte - Chile | | Tel: 56-51-327248 | szuniga@entelchile.net | +------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ ---------- > De: M.Haroutounian@city.ac.uk > A: RATS Discussion List > Asunto: Forecasting GARCH > Fecha: Domingo 12 de Julio de 1998 08:42 AM > > Dear RATS users, > > Can you help to find the way how to use FORECAST function > (dynamic forecasting) with GARCH(1,1) model. > > Thank you, > Maria ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE:impulse response and variance decomposition Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 14:39:10 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS users, Anybody knows any RATS procedures can perform impulse reponse and variance decomposition of VECM, please? Can CATS procedure perform so? CATS can perform estimation of VECM but not innovative accounting??? I feel appreciation if anybody can help me!! Regards, Kevin Senior Lecturer, Hong KOng Shue Yan College ---------- End of message ---------- From: mark.astley@bankofengland.co.uk (Mark Astley) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: RE:impulse response and variance decomposition Date: Mon, 20 Jul 98 12:29:46 +0100 (BST) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 Have a look at the end part of Chapter 6 in the Walter Enders Book "RATS Handbook for Econometric Time Series" Mark S Astley Structural Economic Analysis Division Bank of England Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8AH tel 0171 601 3551 mark.astley@bankofengland.co.uk ---------- End of message ---------- From: Jan To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Stability tests for GMM Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:38:58 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Rats Users, I am interested in performing stability tests for GMM, such as work of Wright (1997) in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 59. Does anyone have a proc to implement such a test? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Yin-Ching Jan National Chin-Yi Institute of Technology Tel:(886-4)3924505-7645 e-mail:jan511@chinyi.ncit.edu.tw ---------- End of message ---------- From: mark.astley@bankofengland.co.uk (Mark Astley) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Forecast Date: Thu, 23 Jul 98 12:27:48 +0100 (BST) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 I'm been doing some forecasting in a basic VAR using the "forecast" command. But I've come across a couple of problems. First the resulting forecasts for one of the variables looks a bit counterintuitive. So I was wondering if it is possible to impose that that variable follows a particular path (ie is constant) over the forecast horizon & work out the implications for the other variables. The only way I've been able to think of so far is to use the matrix/paths option - but the problem with that is that its a bit of a "trial and error" approach (you have to recursively change the shock paths until you get what you want) . So I was wondering if there was a more direct/simple way of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions? My second problem is that my forcasts in the first forecast seem to "jump" quite a lot (and unrealistically) from the last in-sample observation. So I was wondering if it was possible to make sure that my forecasts were consistent with the actual data. My first way of trying to d this was to start the forecasts in the last period of actual data - based upon the premise that RATS would use the data that was actually available rather than generating its own forecast for that period. Unfortunetely, that wasnt the case. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can impose this restriction? (again I thought about "fixing it" using the INPUT option, is there a better method?). Thanks in advance. Mark S Astley ---------- End of message ---------- From: mark.astley@bankofengland.co.uk (Mark Astley) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Please disregard my previous e-mail (Forecasts) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 98 13:59:36 +0100 (BST) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 I've solved my problems - using CNDITION.SRC - see p8-28 of manual. Sorry for any inconvenience. MSA ---------- End of message ---------- From: EW Tallman To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Forecast Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:31:23 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit The application that you want to do (both in fact) can be done in a straightforward manner from the conditional forecasting procedure in RATS referred to as CNDITION. It is described in example 8.5 on page 8-28. Its description is brief, but the program works quickly and accurately. You Condition the forecasts based on any assumptions that you want, including the actual path of variables. I have a more documented version of exactly the same procedure if you are interested. Mark Astley wrote: > I'm been doing some forecasting in a basic VAR using the "forecast" > command. But I've come across a couple of problems. > > First the resulting forecasts for one of the variables looks a bit > counterintuitive. So I was wondering if it is possible to impose that > that variable follows a particular path (ie is constant) over the > forecast horizon & work out the implications for the other variables. > The only way I've been able to think of so far is to use the > matrix/paths option - but the problem with that is that its a bit of a > "trial and error" approach (you have to recursively change the shock > paths until you get what you want) . So I was wondering if there was > a more direct/simple way of doing this. Does anyone have any > suggestions? > > My second problem is that my forcasts in the first forecast seem to > "jump" quite a lot (and unrealistically) from the last > in-sample observation. So I was wondering if it was possible to make > sure that my forecasts were consistent with the actual data. My first > way of trying to d this was to start the forecasts in the last period of > actual data - based upon the premise that RATS would use the data > that was actually available rather than generating its own forecast for > that period. Unfortunetely, that wasnt the case. Does anyone have > any suggestions on how I can impose this restriction? (again I > thought about "fixing it" using the INPUT option, is there a better > method?). > > Thanks in advance. > > Mark S Astley > Return-Path: > Received: from emds.frb.org ([198.35.245.104]) by nt4smtp.atl.frb.org > (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5) with ESMTP id 121 > for ; > Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:03:58 -0400 > Received: from unmanifest.a1smtp.frb.org by a1smtp.frb.org > (PMDF V5.1-10 #29475) id <0EWJ00N01WQ4GF@a1smtp.frb.org> for > EW.Tallman@nt4smtp.atl.frb.org; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:10:53 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from directory.a1smtp.frb.org by a1smtp.frb.org (PMDF V5.1-10 #29475) > id <0EWJ00N01WPSHP@a1smtp.frb.org> for EW.Tallman@nt4smtp.atl.frb.org; Thu, > 23 Jul 1998 10:10:52 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from a1pmdf.a1fw.frb.org by a1smtp.frb.org (PMDF V5.1-10 #29475) > with ESMTP id <0EWJ00N01WPMIG@a1smtp.frb.org> for ew.tallman@atl.frb.org; Thu, > 23 Jul 1998 10:10:35 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from fed1.frb.org (fedora.a1fw.frb.org) > by a1pmdf.a1fw.frb.org (PMDF V5.1-8 #29478) > with SMTP id <0EWJWPJ2900IVN@a1pmdf.a1fw.frb.org> for ew.tallman@atl.frb.org; > Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:10:31 -0400 (EDT) > Received: by fed1.frb.org; id KAA02236; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:10:30 -0400 > Received: from sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au(137.111.1.11) by fedora.frb.org via smap > (3.2) id xma001988; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:10:08 -0400 > Received: from efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (efs1.efs.mq.edu.au [137.111.64.8]) > by sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA03389; Thu, > 23 Jul 1998 23:52:01 +1000 (EST) > Received: from EFS1/SpoolDir by efs1.efs.mq.edu.au (Mercury 1.40) ; Thu, > 23 Jul 1998 23:51:32 +0000 > Received: from SpoolDir by EFS1 (Mercury 1.40); Thu, 23 Jul 1998 23:49:00 +0000 > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 12:27:48 +0100 (BST) > From: mark.astley@bankofengland.co.uk (Mark Astley) > Subject: Forecast > Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au > To: RATS Discussion List > Errors-to: rats-l-owner@efs.mq.edu.au > Reply-to: RATS Discussion List > Message-id: <39EFC0F0118@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au> > MIME-version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 > Content-type: text/plain; X-MAPIextension=.TXT; charset=US-ASCII > Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit > X-Listname: > > I'm been doing some forecasting in a basic VAR using the "forecast" > command. But I've come across a couple of problems. > > First the resulting forecasts for one of the variables looks a bit > counterintuitive. So I was wondering if it is possible to impose that > that variable follows a particular path (ie is constant) over the > forecast horizon & work out the implications for the other variables. > The only way I've been able to think of so far is to use the > matrix/paths option - but the problem with that is that its a bit of a > "trial and error" approach (you have to recursively change the shock > paths until you get what you want) . So I was wondering if there was > a more direct/simple way of doing this. Does anyone have any > suggestions? > > My second problem is that my forcasts in the first forecast seem to > "jump" quite a lot (and unrealistically) from the last > in-sample observation. So I was wondering if it was possible to make > sure that my forecasts were consistent with the actual data. My first > way of trying to d this was to start the forecasts in the last period of > actual data - based upon the premise that RATS would use the data > that was actually available rather than generating its own forecast for > that period. Unfortunetely, that wasnt the case. Does anyone have > any suggestions on how I can impose this restriction? (again I > thought about "fixing it" using the INPUT option, is there a better > method?). > > Thanks in advance. > > Mark S Astley ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Richard G. Anderson" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: time series plots with ratio scales Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:53:37 -0500 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 July 24, 1998 Does anyone have a proc that will produce a plot with a vertical ratio scale but labeled in the original units? or, is there a way to directly address the labels on the vertical axis (with a ratio scale)? Thanks Richard Anderson Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis anderson@stls.frb.org ---------- End of message ---------- From: WOO KAI YIN To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 13:08:07 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS users, I want to run a var model with reference to Campbell and Shiller 1987, cointegration and TEST of the present value models, as follows: sys 1 to 2 vars sb20 sb20{1 to 9} rarb rarb{1 to 9} lags 1 to 1 det constant end(sys) estimate(noftests) 82:2 97:4 for the model: |sb20t| | a(L) b(L)| | sb20t-1 | | u1t | | | = | | | | +| | |rarbt| | c(L) d(L)| | rarbt-1 | | u2t | a(L) ... d(L) is lag-polynomials of order 10. However, I got the error message such that: To Use Series Number -32763. (-series n1 n2 triples are no longer legal) What does it mean? And, how can I carry wald restriction test for the var coefficients, please?? I would be grateful if you could give me sincere help!!! Regards, Kai-yin Woo Senior Lecturer, Hong Kong Shue Yan College ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Wai Lee" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 08:15:14 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 The VARIABLES statement is for the list of endogenous variables, and thus the number of variables should be the same as the number of equations, that is 2 in your case. But you have 20 there. LAGS statement is for the number of lags of each endogenous variables. Are you sure you want a 1 lag, or 9 lags? Check Ch. 8 of manual again for many good e.g. Hope this help. W. Lee hkwoo @ hkabc.net on 07/25/98 01:08:07 AM Please respond to RATS-L@efs.mq.edu.au To: RATS-L @ efs.mq.edu.au cc: (Wai Lee) Subject: Re: Dear RATS users, I want to run a var model with reference to Campbell and Shiller 1987, cointegration and TEST of the present value models, as follows: sys 1 to 2 vars sb20 sb20{1 to 9} rarb rarb{1 to 9} lags 1 to 1 det constant end(sys) estimate(noftests) 82:2 97:4 for the model: |sb20t| | a(L) b(L)| | sb20t-1 | | u1t | | | = | | | | +| | |rarbt| | c(L) d(L)| | rarbt-1 | | u2t | a(L) ... d(L) is lag-polynomials of order 10. However, I got the error message such that: To Use Series Number -32763. (-series n1 n2 triples are no longer legal) What does it mean? And, how can I carry wald restriction test for the var coefficients, please?? I would be grateful if you could give me sincere help!!! Regards, Kai-yin Woo Senior Lecturer, Hong Kong Shue Yan College ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Wai Lee" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: sorting Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 17:35:17 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 I appreciate if you have any suggestions for the following problem. I need to form decile portfolios, and I wonder if it will be difficult to do it in RATS. Say, I have time series of 100 stocks for 240 months, for example. Based on their attributes, say, Price-to-Book, I assign each stock to one of ten portfolios in each month, with portfolio 10 being the one with highest P/B ratio etc. So far, ORDER is the only command I can find for related purpose, and also the max and min for arrays. Do I need to write the sorting algorithm from Numerical Recipes, or there exists some simple techiques/commands in RATS for the job? Thanks for your help. W. Lee ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Chu-sheng Tai" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: CONVERGENCE PROBLEM Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 23:38:22 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BDB9B7.A4998480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear RATS users, I was estimating a GARCH model and encountered a situation where I got = two completely different results when I defined excess equity returns in = two different ways. In the first case, I computed the excess equity returns without = multiplying them by 100, and in the second case, I multiplied them by = 100. =20 The main problem is that I got convergence in the first case ( but it = took more than 24 hours), but I did not get convergence in the second = case, especially the useable observations dropped significantly (please = see the attached partial outputs). I wonder if simply multiplying variables by 100 will result in an = extremely different outcomes. Would you please help me solving this = problem? Thank you very much. yours, Irving=20 Followings are partial program and output for each of the two cases. (I = apologize for this long outputs.) *************************************************************************= *********** ****************Case 1: compute excess returns without multiplying them = by 100 ******************* *************************************************************************= *********** *compute excess equity returns set r_msin =3D log(msinds(t)/msinds(t-1))-log(1+(ecjap7d(t-1)/5200)) ---------- etc. COMPUTE GSTART=3D4 , GEND=3D98:02:27 ---------- ---------- etc. COMPUTE m0 =3D m1 =3D m2 =3D m3 =3D m4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE c0 =3D c1 =3D c2 =3D c3 =3D c4 =3D 0.05 COMPUTE d0 =3D d1 =3D d2 =3D d3 =3D d4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE e0 =3D e1 =3D e2 =3D e3 =3D e4 =3D 0.05 COMPUTE f0 =3D f1 =3D f2 =3D f3 =3D f4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE VA1 =3D VA2 =3D VA3 =3D VA4 =3D VA5 =3D VA6 =3D VA7 =3D VA8 =3D = VA9 =3D VA10 =3D 0.85=20 COMPUTE VB1 =3D VB2 =3D VB3 =3D VB4 =3D VB5 =3D VB6 =3D VB7 =3D VB8 =3D = VB9 =3D VB10 =3D 0.25=20 NLPAR(SUBITERTATION=3D10,CRITERION=3DVALUE,CVCRIT=3D0.000001) MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DSIMPLEX,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D30) LOGL GSTART GEND MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DBFGS,ROBUSTERRORS,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D100) LOGL = GSTART GEND ---------- etc. Estimation by Simplex Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 To 1998:02:27 Usable Observations 528 Degrees of Freedom 483 Function Value 21096.07428975 Variable Coeff ***************************************** 1. M0 0.010812159 2. M1 0.001901283 3. M2 0.011235928 4. M3 0.007492441 5. M4 0.010200325 6. C0 0.061755747 7. C1 0.080515253 8. C2 0.017282199 9. C3 0.125678188 10. C4 0.037357773 11. D0 0.018324936 12. D1 0.004894768 13. D2 0.008070308 14. D3 0.012660719 15. D4 0.020039178 16. E0 0.043180415 17. E1 0.031623566 18. E2 0.053881885 19. E3 0.044197673 20. E4 -0.160809041 21. F0 0.010394614 22. F1 0.009570023 23. F2 -0.001066234 24. F3 0.018879765 25. F4 0.022096128 26. VA1 0.752441128 27. VA2 0.751404340 28. VA3 0.891653175 29. VA4 0.975231723 30. VA5 0.964578069 31. VA6 0.929300651 32. VA7 0.929679164 33. VA8 0.953200257 34. VA9 0.950175168 35. VA10 0.501938284 36. VB1 0.129092791 37. VB2 0.074852993 38. VB3 0.083674852 39. VB4 0.074344616 40. VB5 0.154107701 41. VB6 0.249633620 42. VB7 0.250223397 43. VB8 0.235528674 44. VB9 0.279303705 45. VB10 0.121365372 -----------etc. Non-Linear Optimization, Iteration 73. Subiterations 1 Old Function =3D 2.118968e+004 New Function =3D 2.118970e+004 New Coefficients: 1.106402 -1.927998 1182.470631 -11.221498 = 14791.024790 388.245503 -2609.479117 437978.555022 1320.299261 = -461052.408283 369.771542 -3013.607767 561065.976317 1590.089163 = -448351.381129 17.685576 152.431432 -205813.132826 -499.205793 = 109730.728625 -1.135786 -14.311792 81903.192402 371.091983 = 108517.273715 0.992586 -0.057068 0.957251 0.983057 = 0.973864 0.924469 0.921408 0.939931 0.939025 = 0.228139 0.043098 0.039731 0.050530 0.051017 = 0.127341 0.196460 0.201657 0.238944 0.301134 = 0.051377 Estimation by BFGS Iterations Taken 73 Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 To 1998:02:27 Usable Observations 528 Degrees of Freedom 483 Function Value 21189.70438379 Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat = Signif *************************************************************************= ****** 1. M0 1.1064 0.6439 1.71818 = 0.08576467 2. M1 -1.9280 27.8640 -0.06919 = 0.94483588 3. M2 1182.4706 3014.6683 0.39224 = 0.69488159 4. M3 -11.2215 6.5517 -1.71276 = 0.08675751 5. M4 14791.0248 23621.4775 0.62617 = 0.53120444 6. C0 388.2455 34.6328 11.21035 = 0.00000000 7. C1 -2609.4791 1519.6681 -1.71714 = 0.08595405 8. C2 437978.5550 249256.3125 1.75714 = 0.07889373 9. C3 1320.2993 869.1244 1.51911 = 0.12873373 10. C4 -461052.4083 1296320.6353 -0.35566 = 0.72209346 11. D0 369.7715 34.4692 10.72759 = 0.00000000 12. D1 -3013.6078 1487.0252 -2.02660 = 0.04270317 13. D2 561065.9763 256372.1448 2.18848 = 0.02863447 14. D3 1590.0892 902.3238 1.76222 = 0.07803285 15. D4 -448351.3811 1340159.7182 -0.33455 = 0.73796403 16. E0 17.6856 8.4669 2.08879 = 0.03672658 17. E1 152.4314 477.4047 0.31929 = 0.74950523 18. E2 -205813.1328 90870.5512 -2.26490 = 0.02351853 19. E3 -499.2058 593.3715 -0.84130 = 0.40017768 20. E4 109730.7286 548640.3488 0.20000 = 0.84147679 21. F0 -1.1358 4.9506 -0.22942 = 0.81854078 22. F1 -14.3118 187.7785 -0.07622 = 0.93924697 23. F2 81903.1924 50208.8030 1.63125 = 0.10283723 24. F3 371.0920 261.3823 1.41973 = 0.15568665 25. F4 108517.2737 386409.5216 0.28083 = 0.77883705 26. VA1 0.9926 3.2338e-003 306.94536 = 0.00000000 27. VA2 -0.0571 0.7554 -0.07555 = 0.93977965 28. VA3 0.9573 0.0488 19.60427 = 0.00000000 29. VA4 0.9831 5.2205e-003 188.30596 = 0.00000000 30. VA5 0.9739 3.0247e-003 321.97498 = 0.00000000 31. VA6 0.9245 1.5109e-003 611.85331 = 0.00000000 32. VA7 0.9214 1.5720e-003 586.15325 = NA 33. VA8 0.9399 7.2182e-003 130.21642 = 0.00000000 34. VA9 0.9390 7.3702e-003 127.40794 = 0.00000000 35. VA10 0.2281 0.2699 0.84533 = 0.39792579 36. VB1 0.0431 0.0120 3.57769 = 0.00034664 37. VB2 0.0397 0.0163 2.43259 = 0.01499122 38. VB3 0.0505 0.0142 3.57025 = 0.00035664 39. VB4 0.0510 0.0209 2.43918 = 0.01472068 40. VB5 0.1273 5.4528e-003 23.35358 = 0.00000000 41. VB6 0.1965 0.0194 10.13110 = 0.00000000 42. VB7 0.2017 0.0170 11.84821 = 0.00000000 43. VB8 0.2389 7.7310e-003 30.90727 = 0.00000000 44. VB9 0.3011 0.0163 18.49680 = 0.00000000 45. VB10 0.0514 0.0196 2.61920 = 0.00881357 *************************************************************************= *********** ****************Case 2: compute excess returns by multiplying them by = 100 ********************** *************************************************************************= *********** *compute excess equity returns set r_msin =3D = (log(msinds(t)/msinds(t-1))-log(1+(ecjap7d(t-1)/5200)))*100 ---------- etc. =20 COMPUTE GSTART=3D4 , GEND=3D98:02:27 ---------- ---------- etc. =20 COMPUTE m0 =3D m1 =3D m2 =3D m3 =3D m4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE c0 =3D c1 =3D c2 =3D c3 =3D c4 =3D 0.05 COMPUTE d0 =3D d1 =3D d2 =3D d3 =3D d4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE e0 =3D e1 =3D e2 =3D e3 =3D e4 =3D 0.05 COMPUTE f0 =3D f1 =3D f2 =3D f3 =3D f4 =3D 0.01 COMPUTE VA1 =3D VA2 =3D VA3 =3D VA4 =3D VA5 =3D VA6 =3D VA7 =3D VA8 =3D = VA9 =3D VA10 =3D 0.85=20 COMPUTE VB1 =3D VB2 =3D VB3 =3D VB4 =3D VB5 =3D VB6 =3D VB7 =3D VB8 =3D = VB9 =3D VB10 =3D 0.25=20 =20 NLPAR(SUBITERTATION=3D10,CRITERION=3DVALUE,CVCRIT=3D0.000001) MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DSIMPLEX,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D30) LOGL GSTART GEND MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DBFGS,ROBUSTERRORS,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D100) LOGL = GSTART GEND =20 ---------- etc. Estimation by Simplex Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 To 1998:02:27 Usable Observations 10 Degrees of Freedom -35 Total Observations 528 Skipped/Missing 518 Function Value -73.42365513 Variable Coeff ***************************************** 1. M0 0.009185838 2. M1 0.009924196 3. M2 0.008948882 4. M3 0.010367144 5. M4 0.012066314 6. C0 0.053810470 7. C1 0.059277889 8. C2 0.044099621 9. C3 0.049787864 10. C4 0.036704313 11. D0 0.010664474 12. D1 0.010011599 13. D2 0.007056215 14. D3 0.010683077 15. D4 0.011249667 16. E0 0.050988881 17. E1 0.067392408 18. E2 0.055285068 19. E3 0.049970327 20. E4 -0.002794719 21. F0 0.010057723 22. F1 0.012584350 23. F2 0.010381980 24. F3 0.010332469 25. F4 0.009999176 26. VA1 0.680543966 27. VA2 0.671104645 28. VA3 1.015670025 29. VA4 0.824916518 30. VA5 0.980679765 31. VA6 0.835249847 32. VA7 0.864872661 33. VA8 0.805108962 34. VA9 0.834710783 35. VA10 0.731076708 36. VB1 0.251258684 37. VB2 0.219865499 38. VB3 0.208446334 39. VB4 0.199224648 40. VB5 0.282768222 41. VB6 0.214822323 42. VB7 0.239195733 43. VB8 0.264181294 44. VB9 0.079003518 45. VB10 0.038579394 Non-Linear Optimization, Iteration 1. Subiterations 11 Old Function =3D -6.719387e+003 New Function =3D -6.719387e+003 New Coefficients: NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Estimation by BFGS NO CONVERGENCE IN 1 ITERATIONS LAST CRITERION WAS 0.0000000 SUBITERATIONS LIMIT EXCEEDED. USE NLPAR TO SET HIGHER LIMIT Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 To 1998:02:27 Usable Observations 400 Degrees of Freedom 355 Total Observations 528 Skipped/Missing 128 Function Value -6719.38700193 Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat = Signif *************************************************************************= ****** 1. M0 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 2. M1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 3. M2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 4. M3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 5. M4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 6. C0 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 7. C1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 8. C2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 9. C3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 10. C4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 11. D0 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 12. D1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 13. D2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 14. D3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 15. D4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 16. E0 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 17. E1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 18. E2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 19. E3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 20. E4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 21. F0 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 22. F1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 23. F2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 24. F3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 25. F4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 26. VA1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 27. VA2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 28. VA3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 29. VA4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 30. VA5 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 31. VA6 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 32. VA7 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 33. VA8 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 34. VA9 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 35. VA10 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 36. VB1 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 37. VB2 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 38. VB3 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 39. VB4 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 40. VB5 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 41. VB6 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 42. VB7 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 43. VB8 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 44. VB9 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 45. VB10 NA 0.000000 0.00000 = 0.00000000 ## SR10. Missing Values And/Or SMPL Options Leave No Usable Data Points *************************************************************************= ********************* ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BDB9B7.A4998480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear=20 RATS users,
 
I was=20 estimating a GARCH model and encountered a situation where I got two = completely=20 different results when I defined excess equity returns in two different=20 ways.

In the first case, I computed the excess = equity=20 returns without multiplying them by 100, and in the second case, I = multiplied=20 them by 100. 
The=20 main problem is that I got convergence in the first case ( but it took = more than=20 24 hours), but I did not get convergence in the second case, especially = the=20 useable observations dropped significantly (please see the attached = partial=20 outputs).

I=20 wonder if simply multiplying variables by 100 will result in an = extremely=20 different outcomes.  Would you please help me solving this = problem? =20 Thank you very much.
 
yours,
 
Irving
 
 
Followings are partial program and output for each of the two=20 cases.  (I apologize for this long outputs.)
 
 
******************************************************************= ******************
****************Case=20 1: compute excess returns without multiplying them by 100=20 *******************
**************************************************= **********************************
 
*compute excess equity=20 returns
 
set=20 r_msin =3D=20 log(msinds(t)/msinds(t-1))-log(1+(ecjap7d(t-1)/5200))
 
----------
etc.
 
COMPUTE=20 GSTART=3D4 , GEND=3D98:02:27
----------
----------
etc.
 
COMPUTE m0 =3D m1 =3D m2 =3D m3 =3D m4 =3D = 0.01
COMPUTE c0 =3D c1=20 =3D c2 =3D c3 =3D c4 =3D 0.05
COMPUTE d0 =3D d1 =3D d2 =3D d3 =3D d4 = =3D 0.01
COMPUTE e0 =3D=20 e1 =3D e2 =3D e3 =3D e4 =3D 0.05
COMPUTE f0 =3D f1 =3D f2 =3D f3 =3D = f4 =3D 0.01
COMPUTE VA1=20 =3D VA2 =3D VA3 =3D VA4 =3D VA5 =3D VA6 =3D VA7 =3D VA8 =3D VA9 =3D VA10 = =3D 0.85
COMPUTE VB1 =3D=20 VB2 =3D VB3 =3D VB4 =3D VB5 =3D VB6 =3D VB7 =3D VB8 =3D VB9 =3D VB10 =3D = 0.25=20
 
NLPAR(SUBITERTATION=3D10,CRITERION=3DVALUE,CVCRIT=3D0.000001)
M= AXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DSIMPLEX,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D30)=20 LOGL GSTART = GEND
MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DBFGS,ROBUSTERRORS,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D100) = LOGL GSTART GEND
 
---------- etc.
 
Estimation by Simplex
Weekly Data From = 1988:01:22 To=20 1998:02:27
Usable Observations   =20 528      Degrees of Freedom   = 483
Function=20 Value           &n= bsp;      =20 21096.07428975
 
  =20 Variable           = ;         =20 Coeff
*****************************************
1. =20 M0            = ;           =20 0.010812159
2. =20 M1            = ;           =20 0.001901283
3. =20 M2            = ;           =20 0.011235928
4. =20 M3            = ;           =20 0.007492441
5. =20 M4            = ;           =20 0.010200325
6. =20 C0            = ;           =20 0.061755747
7. =20 C1            = ;           =20 0.080515253
8. =20 C2            = ;           =20 0.017282199
9. =20 C3            = ;           =20 0.125678188
10.=20 C4            = ;           =20 0.037357773
11.=20 D0            = ;           =20 0.018324936
12.=20 D1            = ;           =20 0.004894768
13.=20 D2            = ;           =20 0.008070308
14.=20 D3            = ;           =20 0.012660719
15.=20 D4            = ;           =20 0.020039178
16.=20 E0            = ;           =20 0.043180415
17.=20 E1            = ;           =20 0.031623566
18.=20 E2            = ;           =20 0.053881885
19.=20 E3            = ;           =20 0.044197673
20.=20 E4            = ;          =20 -0.160809041
21.=20 F0            = ;           =20 0.010394614
22.=20 F1            = ;           =20 0.009570023
23.=20 F2            = ;          =20 -0.001066234
24.=20 F3            = ;           =20 0.018879765
25.=20 F4            = ;           =20 0.022096128
26.=20 VA1           &nbs= p;          =20 0.752441128
27.=20 VA2           &nbs= p;          =20 0.751404340
28.=20 VA3           &nbs= p;          =20 0.891653175
29.=20 VA4           &nbs= p;          =20 0.975231723
30.=20 VA5           &nbs= p;          =20 0.964578069
31.=20 VA6           &nbs= p;          =20 0.929300651
32.=20 VA7           &nbs= p;          =20 0.929679164
33.=20 VA8           &nbs= p;          =20 0.953200257
34.=20 VA9           &nbs= p;          =20 0.950175168
35.=20 VA10           &nb= sp;         =20 0.501938284
36.=20 VB1           &nbs= p;          =20 0.129092791
37.=20 VB2           &nbs= p;          =20 0.074852993
38.=20 VB3           &nbs= p;          =20 0.083674852
39.=20 VB4           &nbs= p;          =20 0.074344616
40.=20 VB5           &nbs= p;          =20 0.154107701
41.=20 VB6           &nbs= p;          =20 0.249633620
42.=20 VB7           &nbs= p;          =20 0.250223397
43.=20 VB8           &nbs= p;          =20 0.235528674
44.=20 VB9           &nbs= p;          =20 0.279303705
45.=20 VB10           &nb= sp;         =20 0.121365372
 
-----------etc.
 
Non-Linear Optimization, Iteration 73. = Subiterations=20 1
 Old Function =3D 2.118968e+004   New Function =3D=20 2.118970e+004
 New = Coefficients:
     =20 1.106402      -1.927998   =20 1182.470631     -11.221498  =20 14791.024790
    388.245503   = -2609.479117 =20 437978.555022    1320.299261 = -461052.408283
   =20 369.771542   -3013.607767  = 561065.976317   =20 1590.089163 -448351.381129
    =20 17.685576     152.431432 = -205813.132826   =20 -499.205793  109730.728625
    =20 -1.135786     -14.311792  =20 81903.192402     371.091983 =20 108517.273715
     =20 0.992586     =20 -0.057068      =20 0.957251      =20 0.983057      =20 0.973864
     =20 0.924469      =20 0.921408      =20 0.939931      =20 0.939025      =20 0.228139
     =20 0.043098      =20 0.039731      =20 0.050530      =20 0.051017      =20 0.127341
     =20 0.196460      =20 0.201657      =20 0.238944      =20 0.301134       = 0.051377
 

Estimation by BFGS
Iterations=20 Taken    73
Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 To=20 1998:02:27
Usable Observations   =20 528      Degrees of Freedom   = 483
Function=20 Value           &n= bsp;      =20 21189.70438379
 
  =20 Variable           = ;         =20 Coeff       Std=20 Error      T-Stat    =20 Signif
***************************************************************= ****************
1. =20 M0            = ;            =     =20 1.1064       = 0.6439     =20 1.71818  0.08576467
2. =20 M1            = ;            =    =20 -1.9280      27.8640    =20 -0.06919  0.94483588
3. =20 M2            = ;            =  =20 1182.4706    3014.6683     =20 0.39224  0.69488159
4. =20 M3            = ;            =   =20 -11.2215       = 6.5517    =20 -1.71276  0.08675751
5. =20 M4            = ;            = =20 14791.0248   23621.4775      = 0.62617 =20 0.53120444
6. =20 C0            = ;            =   =20 388.2455      34.6328    =20 11.21035  0.00000000
7. =20 C1            = ;            = =20 -2609.4791    1519.6681     = -1.71714 =20 0.08595405
8. =20 C2            = ;           =20 437978.5550  249256.3125      = 1.75714 =20 0.07889373
9. =20 C3            = ;            =  =20 1320.2993     869.1244      = 1.51911  0.12873373
10.=20 C4            = ;          =20 -461052.4083 1296320.6353     -0.35566 =20 0.72209346
11.=20 D0            = ;            =   =20 369.7715      34.4692    =20 10.72759  0.00000000
12.=20 D1            = ;            = =20 -3013.6078    1487.0252     = -2.02660 =20 0.04270317
13.=20 D2            = ;           =20 561065.9763  256372.1448      = 2.18848 =20 0.02863447
14.=20 D3            = ;            =  =20 1590.0892     902.3238      = 1.76222  0.07803285
15.=20 D4            = ;          =20 -448351.3811 1340159.7182     -0.33455 =20 0.73796403
16.=20 E0            = ;            =    =20 17.6856       = 8.4669     =20 2.08879  0.03672658
17.=20 E1            = ;            =   =20 152.4314     477.4047     =20 0.31929  0.74950523
18.=20 E2            = ;          =20 -205813.1328   90870.5512     = -2.26490 =20 0.02351853
19.=20 E3            = ;            =  =20 -499.2058     593.3715    =20 -0.84130  0.40017768
20.=20 E4            = ;           =20 109730.7286  548640.3488      = 0.20000 =20 0.84147679
21.=20 F0            = ;            =    =20 -1.1358       = 4.9506    =20 -0.22942  0.81854078
22.=20 F1            = ;            =   =20 -14.3118     187.7785     = -0.07622 =20 0.93924697
23.=20 F2            = ;            = =20 81903.1924   50208.8030      = 1.63125 =20 0.10283723
24.=20 F3            = ;            =   =20 371.0920     261.3823     =20 1.41973  0.15568665
25.=20 F4            = ;           =20 108517.2737  386409.5216      = 0.28083 =20 0.77883705
26.=20 VA1           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9926  3.2338e-003    306.94536  = 0.00000000
27.=20 VA2           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 -0.0571       = 0.7554    =20 -0.07555  0.93977965
28.=20 VA3           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9573       = 0.0488    =20 19.60427  0.00000000
29.=20 VA4           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9831  5.2205e-003    188.30596  = 0.00000000
30.=20 VA5           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9739  3.0247e-003    321.97498  = 0.00000000
31.=20 VA6           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9245  1.5109e-003    611.85331  = 0.00000000
32.=20 VA7           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9214  1.5720e-003    = 586.15325    =20 NA
33.=20 VA8           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9399  7.2182e-003    130.21642  = 0.00000000
34.=20 VA9           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.9390  7.3702e-003    127.40794  = 0.00000000
35.=20 VA10           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;  =20 0.2281       = 0.2699     =20 0.84533  0.39792579
36.=20 VB1           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.0431       = 0.0120     =20 3.57769  0.00034664
37.=20 VB2           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.0397       = 0.0163     =20 2.43259  0.01499122
38.=20 VB3           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.0505       = 0.0142     =20 3.57025  0.00035664
39.=20 VB4           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.0510       = 0.0209     =20 2.43918  0.01472068
40.=20 VB5           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.1273  5.4528e-003     23.35358 =20 0.00000000
41.=20 VB6           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.1965       = 0.0194    =20 10.13110  0.00000000
42.=20 VB7           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.2017       = 0.0170    =20 11.84821  0.00000000
43.=20 VB8           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.2389  7.7310e-003     30.90727 =20 0.00000000
44.=20 VB9           &nbs= p;            = ;   =20 0.3011       = 0.0163    =20 18.49680  0.00000000
45.=20 VB10           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;  =20 0.0514       = 0.0196     =20 2.61920  0.00881357
 
 
 
******************************************************************= ******************
****************Case=20 2: compute excess returns by multiplying them  by 100=20 **********************
***********************************************= *************************************
 
*compute = excess equity=20 returns
 
set=20 r_msin =3D=20 (log(msinds(t)/msinds(t-1))-log(1+(ecjap7d(t-1)/5200)))*100=
 
----------
etc.
 
COMPUTE=20 GSTART=3D4 , GEND=3D98:02:27
 
----------
----------
etc.
 
COMPUTE m0 =3D m1 =3D m2 =3D m3 =3D m4 =3D = 0.01
COMPUTE c0 =3D c1=20 =3D c2 =3D c3 =3D c4 =3D 0.05
COMPUTE d0 =3D d1 =3D d2 =3D d3 =3D d4 = =3D 0.01
COMPUTE e0 =3D=20 e1 =3D e2 =3D e3 =3D e4 =3D 0.05
COMPUTE f0 =3D f1 =3D f2 =3D f3 =3D = f4 =3D 0.01
COMPUTE VA1=20 =3D VA2 =3D VA3 =3D VA4 =3D VA5 =3D VA6 =3D VA7 =3D VA8 =3D VA9 =3D VA10 = =3D 0.85
COMPUTE VB1 =3D=20 VB2 =3D VB3 =3D VB4 =3D VB5 =3D VB6 =3D VB7 =3D VB8 =3D VB9 =3D VB10 =3D = 0.25=20
 
NLPAR(SUBITERTATION=3D10,CRITERION=3DVALUE,CVCRIT=3D0.000001)
M= AXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DSIMPLEX,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D30)=20 LOGL GSTART = GEND
MAXIMIZE(TRACE,METHOD=3DBFGS,ROBUSTERRORS,RECURSIVE,ITERS=3D100) = LOGL GSTART GEND
 
---------- etc.

Estimation by Simplex
Weekly Data From = 1988:01:22=20 To 1998:02:27
Usable Observations    =20 10      Degrees of Freedom  =20 -35
 Total Observations   =20 528      = Skipped/Missing     =20 518
Function=20 Value           &n= bsp;        =20 -73.42365513
 
  =20 Variable           = ;         =20 Coeff
*****************************************
1. =20 M0            = ;           =20 0.009185838
2. =20 M1            = ;           =20 0.009924196
3. =20 M2            = ;           =20 0.008948882
4. =20 M3            = ;           =20 0.010367144
5. =20 M4            = ;           =20 0.012066314
6. =20 C0            = ;           =20 0.053810470
7. =20 C1            = ;           =20 0.059277889
8. =20 C2            = ;           =20 0.044099621
9. =20 C3            = ;           =20 0.049787864
10.=20 C4            = ;           =20 0.036704313
11.=20 D0            = ;           =20 0.010664474
12.=20 D1            = ;           =20 0.010011599
13.=20 D2            = ;           =20 0.007056215
14.=20 D3            = ;           =20 0.010683077
15.=20 D4            = ;           =20 0.011249667
16.=20 E0            = ;           =20 0.050988881
17.=20 E1            = ;           =20 0.067392408
18.=20 E2            = ;           =20 0.055285068
19.=20 E3            = ;           =20 0.049970327
20.=20 E4            = ;          =20 -0.002794719
21.=20 F0            = ;           =20 0.010057723
22.=20 F1            = ;           =20 0.012584350
23.=20 F2            = ;           =20 0.010381980
24.=20 F3            = ;           =20 0.010332469
25.=20 F4            = ;           =20 0.009999176
26.=20 VA1           &nbs= p;          =20 0.680543966
27.=20 VA2           &nbs= p;          =20 0.671104645
28.=20 VA3           &nbs= p;          =20 1.015670025
29.=20 VA4           &nbs= p;          =20 0.824916518
30.=20 VA5           &nbs= p;          =20 0.980679765
31.=20 VA6           &nbs= p;          =20 0.835249847
32.=20 VA7           &nbs= p;          =20 0.864872661
33.=20 VA8           &nbs= p;          =20 0.805108962
34.=20 VA9           &nbs= p;          =20 0.834710783
35.=20 VA10           &nb= sp;         =20 0.731076708
36.=20 VB1           &nbs= p;          =20 0.251258684
37.=20 VB2           &nbs= p;          =20 0.219865499
38.=20 VB3           &nbs= p;          =20 0.208446334
39.=20 VB4           &nbs= p;          =20 0.199224648
40.=20 VB5           &nbs= p;          =20 0.282768222
41.=20 VB6           &nbs= p;          =20 0.214822323
42.=20 VB7           &nbs= p;          =20 0.239195733
43.=20 VB8           &nbs= p;          =20 0.264181294
44.=20 VB9           &nbs= p;          =20 0.079003518
45.=20 VB10           &nb= sp;         =20 0.038579394
 

Non-Linear Optimization, Iteration 1. = Subiterations=20 11
 Old Function =3D -6.719387e+003  New Function =3D=20 -6.719387e+003
 New = Coefficients:
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
     =20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA            = ;=20 NA
 

Estimation by BFGS
NO CONVERGENCE IN 1=20 ITERATIONS
LAST CRITERION WAS  0.0000000
SUBITERATIONS LIMIT=20 EXCEEDED. USE NLPAR TO SET HIGHER LIMIT
Weekly Data From 1988:01:22 = To=20 1998:02:27
Usable Observations   =20 400      Degrees of Freedom  =20 355
 Total Observations   =20 528      = Skipped/Missing     =20 128
Function=20 Value           &n= bsp;      =20 -6719.38700193
 
  =20 Variable           = ;         =20 Coeff       Std=20 Error      T-Stat    =20 Signif
***************************************************************= ****************
1. =20 M0            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
2. =20 M1            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
3. =20 M2            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
4. =20 M3            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
5. =20 M4            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
6. =20 C0            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
7. =20 C1            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
8. =20 C2            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  = 0.00000000
9. =20 C3            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
10.=20 C4            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
11.=20 D0            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
12.=20 D1            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
13.=20 D2            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
14.=20 D3            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
15.=20 D4            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
16.=20 E0            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
17.=20 E1            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
18.=20 E2            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
19.=20 E3            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
20.=20 E4            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
21.=20 F0            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
22.=20 F1            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
23.=20 F2            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
24.=20 F3            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
25.=20 F4            = ;            =    =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
26.=20 VA1           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
27.=20 VA2           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
28.=20 VA3           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
29.=20 VA4           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
30.=20 VA5           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
31.=20 VA6           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
32.=20 VA7           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
33.=20 VA8           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
34.=20 VA9           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
35.=20 VA10           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p; =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
36.=20 VB1           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
37.=20 VB2           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
38.=20 VB3           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
39.=20 VB4           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
40.=20 VB5           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
41.=20 VB6           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
42.=20 VB7           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
43.=20 VB8           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
44.=20 VB9           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000  0.00000000
45.=20 VB10           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p; =20 NA         =20 0.000000      0.00000 =20 0.00000000
 
## SR10. Missing Values And/Or = SMPL Options=20 Leave No Usable Data Points
 
******************************************************************= ****************************
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BDB9B7.A4998480-- ---------- End of message ---------- From: Katja Gerling To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Adjustment coefficient in ECM Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 10:34:50 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: Organization: The Kiel Institute of World Economics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear RATS-users, I have a rather general problem: I estimated a factor demand model (investment demand and two types of labour demand) as error-correction model with panel data.For my investment demand equation I get an adjustment coefficient which exceeds 1. I tried several things (different scaling of the data, dummy variables etc.) to get rid of this strange result but nothing seems to work. Does anybody have an idea what I could do or how I could interprete this? Katja ---------- End of message ---------- From: Price SG To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 12:41:04 +0100 (BST) Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 Without looking at the data it's hard to tell what's going on but conceivably this is not so ludicrous as it might seem. Single equation stability requires the loading lies between 0 and -2. (I presume your statement that the "adjustment coefficient ... exceeds 1" means the loading is more negative than -1.). So a loading of -1.5 implies investment is overshooting the long-run values but is still stable. Nevertheless, this does seem a little odd. But if you look at the system dynamics then they may be smoother so that the overshooting is offset by dynamics elsewhere. ******************************************************************* Prof Simon Price email: s.g.price@city.ac.uk Department of Economics City University Tel (work): +44 (0)171 477 8000 ext 4503 Northampton Square Fax (work): +44 (0)171 477 8580 London EC1V 0HB UK URL http://www.city.ac.uk/~sm344 ******************************************************************* On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Katja Gerling wrote: > I have a rather general problem: I estimated a factor demand model > (investment demand and two types of labour demand) as error-correction > model with panel data.For my investment demand equation I get an > adjustment coefficient which exceeds 1. I tried several things > (different scaling of the data, dummy variables etc.) to get rid of this > strange result but nothing seems to work. Does anybody have an idea what > I could do or how I could interprete this? ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Stuart M. Glosser" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: sorting Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 13:59:21 -0500 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40 >I need to form decile portfolios, and I wonder if it will be difficult to >do it in RATS. Say, I have time series of 100 stocks for 240 months, for >example. Based on their attributes, say, Price-to-Book, I assign each >stock to one of ten portfolios in each month, with portfolio 10 being the >one with highest P/B ratio etc. > Unless I am missing something, this seems easy to do in Rats. First create 2 240 x 100 matrices, PB and C. If the P-t-B ratios for each company are in a separate data series, then use Make to create a 240 x 100 rectangular matrix PB from your data series. The actual values of each row of the second matrix, C, would range from numbers 1 to 100, where each number corresponds to a company. Put another way, the first column in C would be all ones (corresponding to company #1) etc. Likewise, the first column of PB should be company 1's price to book ratio etc. Next write a loop using Set (you would probably want to use Labels or Eqv here) to create data series PB1 through PB240 from matrix PB and data series C1 through C240 from matrix C. [To use Order, the observations have to be in data series form.] Each of these series has 100 observations. Next, in the same loop, perform the following operation: order pb(i) / c(i) c(i) is now reordered according to the ranking of pb(i). Use these sorted values for the c(i) series to Make the 240 x 100 matrix CS. Next write a loop putting the first 10 columns of CS into a the 240 x 10 matrix port1 etc. I hope this helps. Stuart Glosser Dept. of Economics Univ. of Wisconsin at Whitewater glossers@uwwvax.uww.edu ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Christopher F Baum" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: sorting Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 16:21:48 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mulberry (MacOS) [1.3.3, s/n P020-300786-009] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Actually the RANK option on the ORDER command can be used to generate ranks without any sorting of the data. Here's a program that given a set of nstock values for each of nmonth generates decile portfolio indicators for each stock and month: * decile portfolio creation cfb 8728 (baum@bc.edu) * comp nstock=20 comp nmonth=10 * * need to allocate (nstock+nmonth) series, where nmonth>nstock * all nstock+nmonth nmonth * * generate some fake data * do i=1,nstock set [series]i = 1.0+%ran(1.0) enddo * * transpose the series into one series per month (could also be done by * reading the data from an external file in transposed form) * make a # 1 to nstock mat b = tr(a) do i=1,nmonth set [series](i+nstock) 1 nstock = b(t,i) enddo * * for each month, generate the ranks of the stocks and place back in * the original series (assumes nmonth>nstock) * do i=1,nmonth order(rank=[series]i) [series](i+nstock) enddo * dec vec ndecile(10) ewise ndecile(i)=float(10*i)/100.0*nstock * * generate the portfolio number for each stock in the original series * assume fewer than 1000 stocks * do i=1,nmonth do j=1,10 set(scratch) [series]i 1 nstock = $ %if(([series]i)(t)<=ndecile(j),j+1000,([series](i))(t)) enddo enddo do i=1,nmonth set [series]i 1 nstock = [series]i - 1000 enddo * * now the first nmonth series contain the portfolio numbers for each * stock; we can thus calculate statistics, run regressions, etc. for * each month in which we only consider a given decile portfolio * For now look at only one month (kmo) * comp kmo=1 do i=1,10 set dum 1 nstock = ([series](kmo)==i) dis 'month #1: descriptive stats for decile portfolio ' i stat(smpl=dum) [series](nstock+kmo) 1 nstock enddo * end Kit Baum Boston College ============== --On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 13:59 -0500 "Stuart M. Glosser" wrote: >>I need to form decile portfolios, and I wonder if it will be difficult to >>do it in RATS. Say, I have time series of 100 stocks for 240 months, for >>example. Based on their attributes, say, Price-to-Book, I assign each >>stock to one of ten portfolios in each month, with portfolio 10 being the >>one with highest P/B ratio etc. >> > Unless I am missing something, this seems easy to do in Rats. > > First create 2 240 x 100 matrices, PB and C. If the P-t-B ratios for each > company are in a separate data series, then use Make to create a 240 x 100 > rectangular matrix PB from your data series. The actual values of each row > of the second matrix, C, would range from numbers 1 to 100, where each > number corresponds to a company. Put another way, the first column in C > would be all ones (corresponding to company #1) etc. Likewise, the first > column of PB should be company 1's price to book ratio etc. > > Next write a loop using Set (you would probably want to use Labels or Eqv > here) to create data series PB1 through PB240 from matrix PB and data > series C1 through C240 from matrix C. [To use Order, the observations have > to be in data series form.] Each of these series has 100 observations. > > Next, in the same loop, perform the following operation: > > order pb(i) / c(i) > > c(i) is now reordered according to the ranking of pb(i). > > Use these sorted values for the c(i) series to Make the 240 x 100 matrix > CS. Next write a loop putting the first 10 columns of CS into a the 240 x > 10 matrix port1 etc. > > I hope this helps. > > Stuart Glosser > Dept. of Economics > Univ. of Wisconsin at Whitewater > > glossers@uwwvax.uww.edu > > ---------- End of message ---------- From: szuniga@entelchile.net (SERGIO ZUNIGA JARA) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE: histograms Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 21:01:35 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Rats users: Does anybody know a simple way to get frecuency histograms (bar-graphics) in RATS?. Regards, ---------- End of message ---------- From: laurent ferrara CML RRC To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: histograms Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 10:17:54 -0700 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 [fr] (Win16; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I possess a procedure called HIST.SRC, who computes and graphs histogram for a single serie, I can send it to you. You can also do this with the procedure DENSITY.SRC written by Gunnar Bardsen, who computes a nonparametric estimation of the density function of a data serie using a standard normal kernel. Laurent Ferrara RATP, Departement Commercial. ---------- End of message ---------- From: "David Montgomery" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: singular value decomposition Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 22:31:20 -1000 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Does any body have a code that will perform a singular value decomposition? Thanks, David Montgomery ---------- End of message ---------- From: "Estima" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: Re: histograms Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:54:44 -0600 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) > I possess a procedure called HIST.SRC, who computes and graphs histogram > for a single serie, I can send it to you. There is also a HIST.SRC procedure (and a variation called HISTSCAT.SRC) available on our Web site (don't know if it's the same HIST.SRC or not). The HIST version produces nice bar graphs, but there's no good way to get histogram-style labelling on that kind of graph. The HISTSCAT plot does nicer labeling, but is limited to symbol or line-style graphs. Note that you can also generate frequency plots in the RATSDATA utility program. Sincerely, Tom Maycock Estima ------------------------------------------------------------ | Estima | Sales: (800) 822-8038 | | P.O. Box 1818 | Support: (847) 864-1910 | | Evanston, IL 60204-1818 | Fax: (847) 864-6221 | | USA | estima@estima.com | | | http://www.estima.com | ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- End of message ---------- From: szuniga@entelchile.net (SERGIO ZUNIGA JARA) To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: RE: histograms Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 13:31:13 -0400 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In the ESTIMA Web I found HIST.SRC and HISTSCAT.SRC Thank you for the offer. Regards, ---------- > De: laurent ferrara CML RRC > A: RATS Discussion List > Asunto: Re: histograms > Fecha: Miércoles 29 de Julio de 1998 01:17 PM > > I possess a procedure called HIST.SRC, who computes and graphs histogram > for a single serie, I can send it to you. > You can also do this with the procedure DENSITY.SRC written by Gunnar > Bardsen, who computes a nonparametric estimation of the density function > of a data serie using a standard normal kernel. > > Laurent Ferrara > RATP, Departement Commercial. ---------- End of message ---------- From: wan To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: markov switching!! Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 11:36:10 +0800 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I) (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi: Is there any code can do markov switching estimation and FORECASTNG!!!Thanks!! ---------- End of message ---------- From: "clecourt" To: "RATS Discussion List" Subject: two density functions on a same scater plot. Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:27:45 +0200 Errors-to: Reply-to: "RATS Discussion List" Sender: Maiser@efs1.efs.mq.edu.au X-listname: X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) [F] (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.40) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Dear all, can someone tell me how to superimpose two density functions on a same scater plot. Thanks a lot. \\\|||||/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---- +----------------------------------------+ | Christelle Lecourt | Centres de Recherche: MEDE ET CADRE | | Economiste | Tel: 0032 (0)85/25.04.06 | | UNIVERSITE DE LILLE II | e-Mail: clecourt@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr | +---------------Oooo-----+----------------------------------------+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) ---------- End of message ----------