{smcl} {* 23dec2014}{...} {title:Title} {p2colset 5 16 18 2}{...} {p2col :{hi:artmenu} {hline 2}}ART (Assessment of Resources for Trials) - Main dialog invoker{p_end} {p2colreset}{...} {title:Syntax} {p 8 17 2} {cmd:artmenu} {cmd:on} | {cmd:off} {p 8 17 2} {cmd:artmenu on} installs ART as a new item on the {cmd:User} menu. {p 8 17 2} {cmd:artmenu off} removes ART from the {cmd:User} menu. {title:Description} {pstd} ART provides sample size and power calculations in potentially complex randomised studies with a survival-time or a binary outcome. The ART system (dialogs and associated ado-files) has the following flexible features: {p 8 15 2}1. Any number of randomised groups from 2 upwards. {p 8 15 2}2. Global or linear trend tests with arbitrary dose levels. {p 8 15 2}3. Logrank test - unweighted or weighted (Tarone-Ware or Harrington-Fleming with any index). {p 8 15 2}4. Binomial - conditonal and unconditional tests. {p 8 15 2}5. Time-dependent rates of event, loss to follow-up and withdrawal from allocated treatment (treatment change). {p 8 15 2}6. Staggered patient entry {p 8 15 2}7. Superiority or non-inferiority designs {pstd} The ART menu provides access to all these features. Alternatively, for experienced users the underlying commands are available - see help on {help artsurv} and {help artbin} for details. Execution from the menu generates the underlying command in the Review and Stata Results windows and may be used as an ad-hoc tutorial. {pstd} For suggestions on how to document sample size calculations and how to deal with designs in which several experimental arms are compared with a single control arm, see Remarks. {title:Remarks} {hi:Documenting sample size calculations} {pstd} It is clearly important to be able to document your sample size calculation for inspection at a later date. A simple way to do this is as follows. Once you have a sample size calculation as you want it, open a log file in Stata (through the main menu item File/Log/Begin...) and re-run the calculation, either from the ART dialog or directly from the command line. When you have finished, close the log file through the File/Log/Close menu item. {pstd} To print the log file, use Stata's {help print} command. For example, if you have created a log file called {cmd:mylog.smcl}, you type {cmd:print mylog.smcl} to print it. Stata automatically interprets the special {help SMCL} codes embedded in the file to give readable results. {pstd} Alternatively, if you want to create a plain text log-file, select filetype {cmd:Log (*.log)} in the File/Log/Begin Logging Stata Output dialog. This has the advantage of being readable in a plain text editor. {pstd} To reproduce the sample size calculation in Stata, you can edit the log file in a text editor and extract the sample command(s), which will begin with either {cmd:artsurv} or {cmd:artbin}. With a plain text log-file, make sure you remove the {cmd:> } line-continuation symbol and preceding carriage return. Save the commands to a suitable {it:filename}{cmd:.do} and re-execute in Stata by typing {cmd:do} {it:filename}. With a SMCL log file you will still see the sample-size commands and you can edit the file to remove the junk in the same way as for a plain text file, except that SMCL files do not have line-continuation symbols. {hi:Multi-arm trials: Comparisons with a control arm} {pstd} When using ART to calculate sample size for trials with more than 2 groups, the default assumption is a global comparison of all treatment groups simultaneously. (This is identical in concept to the F-test for comparing groups in one-way analysis of variance.) Often, one would prefer to compare each group with a single control arm (usually designated group 1). A simple way to preserve approximately the right overall type 1 error probability, alpha, in such cases is by applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. With a 3-arm trial, for example, there would be 2 comparisons with control, so each comparison should be made using a significance level of alpha_star = alpha/2. The sample size would be calculated in ART using a two-arm design with a type I error of alpha_star. Suppose this gave a sample size of n_star. Assuming a 1:1:1 randomization (an allocation ratio of 1), the desired total sample size, n, is obtained by multiplying n_star/2 by 3. In a K-arm trial, n = (n_star/2)*K. {pstd} The general solution for n in a K-arm trial with allocation ratio r, that is where r times as many patients are to be randomized to each experimental arm as the control arm, is as follows: {p 8 8 2} n = [n_star/(1+r)]*[1+(K-1)*r] {pstd} For example with r = 1.5 and K = 3 we would require {p 8 8 2} n = [n_star/(1+r)]*[1+(K-1)*r] = (n_star/2.5)*(1+2*1.5) = n_star*8/5 {pstd} In reality such calculations are slightly conservative, i.e. give slightly too many patients, or equivalently, slightly too much power with the given number of patients. The reason is that since each experimental arm is compared with the same control arm, the estimated treatment effects are correlated. The correlation violates the assumption of independence underlying the Bonferroni correction. With equal allocation the correlation is 0.5, but it varies if the allocation ratio differs from 1. It is possible to calculate the correct overall type 1 error in this situation - this requires tail areas of the multivariate Normal distribution on K-1 variables. For example, with 3 arms, allocation ratio 1 and alpha = 5%, the correct value of alpha_star is approximately 3%. {title:Authors} {pstd}Abdel Babiker, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL{break} {browse "mailto:a.babiker@ucl.ac.uk":Ab Babiker} {pstd}Friederike Maria-Sophie Barthel, formerly MRC Clinical Trials Unit{break} {browse "mailto:sophie@fm-sbarthel.de":Sophie Barthel} {pstd}Babak Choodari-Oskooei, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL{break} {browse "mailto:b.choodari-oskooei@ucl.ac.uk":Babak Oskooei} {pstd}Patrick Royston, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL{break} {browse "mailto:j.royston@ucl.ac.uk":Patrick Royston} {title:References} {pstd} The article listed first describes an earlier version of the ART system for Stata 7 which uses the same underlying technology. The ART help files detail the most recent enhancements and changes. {phang} Royston, P., and A. Babiker. 2002. A menu-driven facility for complex sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials with a survival or a binary outcome. Stata Journal 2: 151-163. {phang} Barthel, F. M.-S., Royston, P., and A. Babiker. 2005. A menu-driven facility for complex sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials with a survival or binary outcome: update. {it:Stata Journal} 5: 123-129. {phang} Barthel, F. M.-S., Babiker, A., Royston, P., and M. K. B. Parmar. 2006. Evaluation of sample size and power for multi-arm survival trials allowing for non-uniform accrual, non-proportional hazards, loss to follow-up and cross-over. {it:Statistics in Medicine} 25: 2521-2542. {title:Also see} Manual: {hi:[R] sampsi}, {hi:[R] stpower} {p 4 13 2} Online: help for {help artsurv}, {help artbin}, {help artsurvdlg}, {help artbindlg}