{smcl} {* 17dec2020}{...} {cmd:help ceqiop} (beta version; please report bugs) {right:Sean Higgins} {hline} {title:Title} {p 4 11 2} {hi:ceqiop} {hline 2} Estimates ex-ante inequality of opportunity by income concept for sheet "E4. Inequality of Opportunity" of the CEQ Master Workbook 2016 {pstd} {ul:Caution:} The construction of the CEQ income concepts Market Income, Market Income plus Pensions, Net Market Income, Gross Income, and Taxable Income will differ depending on which scenario for the public contributory pension system has been chosen. In the public contributory Pensions as Deferred Income (PDI) scenario, pension system income is treated as (Market) income earned previously deferred until today; while pension system contributions are treated as mandatory savings (income deferred to one’s future self). In contrast, the contributory Pensions as Government Transfer(PGT) scenario, pension system income is treated as a pure transfer (from the fisc), while pension system contributions are treated as a tax. In the PDI scenario pensions are prefiscal income while in the PGT scenario the public contributory pension system is a fiscal tax and transfer system that redistributes income from today’s working-age population to today’s pension-age population. When the user wishes to analyze both PDI and PGT scenarios, this command must be run twice: once for outputting information generated under the PDI scenario to a Masterworkbook (section E); and again for outputting information generated under the PGT scenario to its own Masterworkbook (section E). See also the Income concepts options section below for more detail. {title:Syntax} {p 8 11 2} {cmd:ceqiop} {ifin} {weight} [{cmd:using} {it:filename}] {cmd:,} {opth gr:oupby(varlist)} [{it:options}]{break} {synoptset 29 tabbed}{...} {synopthdr} {synoptline} {syntab:Required} {synopt :{opth groupb:y(varlist)}}Categorical variables that identify circumstances. (If each observation in the data set is a household, the variable should identify values for the household head.){p_end} {syntab:Income concepts} {synopt :{opth m:arket(varname)}}Market income{p_end} {synopt :{opth mp:luspensions(varname)}}Market income plus pensions{p_end} {synopt :{opth n:etmarket(varname)}}Net market income{p_end} {synopt :{opth g:ross(varname)}}Gross income{p_end} {synopt :{opth t:axable(varname)}}Taxable income{p_end} {synopt :{opth d:isposable(varname)}}Disposable income{p_end} {synopt :{opth c:onsumable(varname)}}Consumable income{p_end} {synopt :{opth f:inal(varname)}}Final income{p_end} {syntab:Survey information} {synopt :{opth hs:ize(varname)}}Number of members in the household (should be used when each observation in the data set is a household){p_end} {synopt :{opth hh:id(varname)}}Unique household identifier variable (should be used when each observation in the data set is an individual){p_end} {synopt :{opth he:ad(string)}}Gives the condition identifying the household head (should be used when each observation in the data set is an individual){p_end} {synopt :{opth psu(varname)}}Primary sampling unit; can also be set using {help svyset:svyset}{p_end} {synopt :{opth s:trata(varname)}}Strata (used with complex sampling desings); can also be set using {help svyet:svyset}{p_end} {syntab:Ignore missing values} {synopt :{opt ignorem:issing}}Ignore any missing values of income concepts and fiscal interventions {syntab:Export directly to CEQ Master Workbook (requires Stata 13 or newer)} {synopt :{opth coun:try(string)}}Country{p_end} {synopt :{opth surv:eyyear(string)}}Year of survey{p_end} {synopt :{opth auth:ors(string)}}Authors of study{p_end} {synopt :{opth scen:ario(string)}}Scenario{p_end} {synopt :{opth grou:p(string)}}Group{p_end} {synopt :{opth proj:ect(string)}}Project{p_end} {synopt :{opth sheet(string)}}Name of sheet to write population matrices. Default is "E4. Inequality of Opportunity"{p_end} {synopt :{opt open}}Automatically open CEQ Master Workbook with new results added{p_end} {synoptline} {p 4 6 2} {cmd:pweight} allowed; see {help weights}. Alternatively, weights can be specified using {help svyset}. {title:Required packages} {pstd} {cmd:ceqiop} requires installation of {cmd:oppincidence} (Higgins, 2012), which is part of the CEQ Stata Package; to install, {stata ssc install ceq, replace:ssc install ceq, replace}. {title:Description} {pstd} {cmd:ceqiop} measures ex-ante inequality of opportunity for each of the CEQ core income concepts, following the non-parametric method in Ferreira and Gignoux (2011). Circumstance sets are specified by the variables in {opth groupb:y(varlist)}. For example, one circumstance set could be (female, black, parents were college graduates, urban): all individuals with those four traits are grouped together in one circumstance set. Circumstances are pre-determined factors that are not dependent on an individual’s effort, such as race, gender, and parents’ education or parents’ income. A smoothed income distribution is created by assigning each individual the mean income of the individuals in his or her circumstances set. Inequality (measured using mean log deviation) of the smoothed income distribution for each income concept gives the measure of inequality of opportunity in levels by income concept. This is labeled "In levels". Dividing the resulting measure by the mean log deviation for the actual income distribution measures the ratio of inequality due to inequality of opportunity as opposed to inequality of effort. This is labeled "In ratios". {pstd} If the data set is at the individual level (each observation is an individual), the variable with the identification code of each household (i.e., it takes the same value for all members within a household) should be specified in the {opth hh:id(varname)} option; the {opth hs:ize(varname)} option should not be specified. Furthermore, since the circumstance variables specified in {opth gr:oupby(varlist)} could be defined at the individual level, for data sets at the individual level, the condition identifying household heads must be specified. For example, if we have a variable called {cmd:hh_status} that takes a value of 1 for the household head, 2 for the spouse, etc., we would specify {cmd:head(hh_status==1)}. If a variable name is given rather than a condition, e.g. {cmd:head(hh_status)}, {cmd:ceqiop} assumes that household heads are individuals for whom that variable is equal to 1. {pstd} If the data set is at the household level, the number of members in the household should be specified in {opth hs:ize(varname)}; the {opth hh:id(varname)} option should not be specified. Furthermore, the variables given in {opth gr:oupby(varlist)} should be variables for the household head, e.g. a variable for gender would indicate the gender of the household head. In either case (household or individual level data set), the weight used should be the household sampling weight and should {it:not} be multiplied by the number of members in the household since the program will do this multiplication automatically in the case of household-level data. {pstd} There are two options for including information about weights and survey sample design for accurate estimates and statistical inference. The sampling weight can be entered using {weight} or {help svyset}. Information about complex stratified sample designs can also be entered using {help svyset} since {cmd:ceqiop} automatically uses the information specified using {help svyset}. Alternatively, the primary sampling unit can be entered using the {opth psu(varname)} option and strata can be entered using the {opth s:trata(varname)} option. {pstd} By default, {cmd: ceqiop} does not allow income concept or fiscal intervention variables to have missing values: if a household has 0 income for an income concept, receives 0 from a transfer or a subsidy, or pays 0 of a tax, the household should have 0 rather than a missing value. If one of these variables has missing values, the command will produce an error. For flexibility, however, the command includes an {opt ignorem:issing} option that will drop observations with missing values for any of these variables, thus allowing the command to run even if there are missing values. {pstd} Negative incomes are allowed, but a warning is issued for each core income concept that has negative values (or positive values when a fiscal intervention is stored as negative values). This is because various measures are no longer well-behaved when negative values are included (for example, the Gini coefficient, concentration coefficient, or squared poverty gap can exceed 1, and other desirable properties of these measures when incomes are non-negative no longer hold when negative values are allowed). {marker opt} {title:Options} {marker cor} {dlgtab:Core options} {phang} {opt using} is required, and indicates the filename for the output. Results are automatically exported to the CEQ Master Workbook Output Tables if {cmd:using} {it:filename} is specifed in the command, where {it:filename} is the Master Workbook. By default, {cmd:ceqiop} prints to a sheet titled "E4. Inequality of Opportunity"; the user can override the sheet name using the {opt sheet(string)} option. Exporting directly to the Master Workbook requires Stata 13 or newer. The Master Workbook populated with results from {cmd:ceqiop} can be automatically opened if the {opt open} option is specified (in this case, {it:filename} cannot have spaces). Results are also saved in matrices available from {cmd:return list}. To produce only a portion of the results, specify only a subset of the income concept options. {p 8 8 2} Notice that if the user wishes to do the CEQ {it} Assessment {sf} for both the {bf: "pensions as deferred income scenario"} and {bf: "pensions as government transfer scenario"}, the ado does {bf: NOT} run both scenarios automatically. The user must run the ado twice, one time per scenario (see Income concepts options for an explanation on the differences across scenarios), and create two separate sets of E sheets. Hence, {it:filename} should be changed accordingly. {marker inc} {dlgtab:Income concepts options} {pstd} The CEQ core income concepts include market income, market income plus pensions, net market income, gross income, taxable income, disposable income, consumable income, and final income. The variables for these income concepts, which should be expressed in local currency units (preferably {bf:per year} for ease of comparison with totals from national accounts), are indicated using the {opth m:arket(varname)}, {opth mp:luspensions(varname)}, {opth n:etmarket(varname)}, {opth g:ross(varname)}, {opth t:axable(varname)}, {opth d:isposable(varname)}, {opth c:onsumable(varname)}, and {opth f:inal(varname)} options. {pstd} The public contributory old-age pension system can be incorporated into a CEQ Assessment as deferred income or as a government transfer (for a detailed discussion regarding the alternatives see Lustig (2018) available at {browse "http://commitmentoequity.org/publications-ceq-handbook"}). The decision regarding the public contributory pension system can have a significant impact on assessing the redistributive power of a fiscal system, especially in countries with a high proportion of retirees and large spending on social security. The construction of Market income, Market income plus pensions, Gross income, Net market income, and Taxable Income will differ between the PDI and PGT scenarios (while Disposable income, Consumable income and Final income are equivalent in value in both scenarios). The user must create two separate sets of E sheets, one per scenario (for a more detailed explanation see {cmd: using} in {help ceqlorenz##cor:core options}). {pstd} In CEQ {it} Assessments {sf} in the {bf: "pensions as deferred income scenario"}, it is assumed that contributions during working years are a form of “forced saving” and income concepts are defined in the following way: {p 16 16 10} Market income given by {opth m:arket(varname)} as factor income (wages and salaries and income from capital) plus private transfers (remittances, private pensions, etc.) {bf: PLUS} imputed rent and own production {bf: MINUS} contributions to social insurance old-age pensions. {p 16 16 10} Market income plus pensions given by {opth mp:luspensions(varname)} as Market income (PDI) {bf: PLUS} contributory social insurance old-age pensions. Prefiscal income (PDI) is defined as Market income plus Pensions (PDI). {p 16 16 10} Gross Income given by {opth g:ross(varname)} as Market Income plus pensions (PDI) {bf: PLUS} direct cash and near cash transfers (conditional and unconditional cash transfers, school feeding programs, free food transfers, etc.). {p 16 16 10} Net Market Income given by {opth n:etmarket(varname)} as Market Income plus pensions (PDI) {bf: MINUS} direct taxes and {bf: MINUS} non-pension social contributions. {p 16 16 10} Taxable income given by {opth t:axable(varname)} as Gross Income (PDI) {bf: MINUS} all non-taxable Gross Income components. {p 16 16 10} Disposable income given by {opth d:isposable(varname)} as Market Income plus pensions (PDI) {bf: PLUS} all direct transfers {bf: MINUS} all direct taxes and non-pension social contributions. {pstd} In the {bf: "pensions as government transfer scenario"}, it is assumed that pensions are a pure government transfers and income concepts are defined in the following way: {p 16 16 10} Market income given by {opth m:arket(varname)} as factor income (wages and salaries and income from capital) plus private transfers (remittances, private pensions, etc.) {bf: PLUS} imputed rent and own production. Prefiscal income (PGT) is defined as Market income (PGT). {p 16 16 10} Market income plus pensions given by {opth mp:luspensions(varname)} as Market income (PGT) {bf: PLUS} contributory social insurance old-age pensions. {p 16 16 10} Gross Income given by {opth g:ross(varname)} as Market Income plus pensions (PGT) {bf: PLUS} direct cash and near cash transfers (conditional and unconditional cash transfers, school feeding programs, free food transfers, etc.). {p 16 16 10} Net Market Income given by {opth n:etmarket(varname)} as Market Income (PGT) {bf: MINUS} direct taxes and {bf: MINUS} non-pension social contributions. {p 16 16 10} Taxable income given by {opth t:axable(varname)} as Gross Income (PGT) {bf: MINUS} all non-taxable Gross Income components. {p 16 16 10} Disposable income given by {opth d:isposable(varname)} as Market Income (PGT) {bf: MINUS} all direct taxes {bf: PLUS} pension income {bf: PLUS} all other direct transfers {bf: MINUS} all pension and non-pension social contributions. {pstd} The construction of Consumable and Final income is done in the same way in both the PDI and PGT scenarios: {p 16 16 10} Consumable income given by {opth c:onsumable(varname)} as Disposable Income {bf: PLUS} indirect subsidies (energy, food and other general or targeted price subsidies) and {bf: MINUS} indirect taxes (VAT, excise taxes, and other indirect taxes). {p 16 16 10} Final income given by {opth f:inal(varname)} as Consumable income {bf: PLUS} Monetized value of in-kind transfers in education and health services at average government cost and {bf: MINUS} co-payments and user fees. {title:Examples} {pstd}Individual-level data (each observation is an individual){p_end} {phang} {cmd:. ceqiop [pw=w] using C:/MWB2016_E4.xlsx, groupby(sex race region) head(hh_status==1) hhid(hh_code) psu(psu_var) strata(stra_var) m(ym) mplusp(ymplusp) n(yn) g(yg) t(yt) d(yd) c(yc) f(yf)open}{p_end} {pstd}Household-level data (each observation is a household){p_end} {phang} {cmd:. ceqiop [pw=w] using C:/MWB2016_E4.xlsx, groupby(head_sex head_race head_region) hsize(members) psu(psu_var) strata(stra_var) m(ym) mp(ymplusp) n(yn) g(yg) t(yt) d(yd) c(yc) f(yf) open}{p_end} {title:Saved results} {synopt:{cmd:r(levels)}}Mean log deviations (MLD) of smoothed distribution {p_end} {synopt:{cmd:r(ratios)}}MLD of smoothed distribution over MLD of original distribution {p_end} {title:Author} {p 4 4 2}Sean Higgins, UC Berkeley, seanhiggins@berkeley.edu {title:References} {pstd}Commitment to Equity (CEQ) {browse "http://www.commitmentoequity.org":website}.{p_end} {phang} Ferreira, F. and J. Gignoux. 2011. {browse "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00467.x/abstract":"The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and an Application to Latin America,"} {it:Review of Income and Wealth} 57, 622-657.{p_end} {pstd}Lustig, Nora, editor. 2018. {browse "https://commitmentoequity.org/publications-ceq-handbook":Commitment to Equity Handbook. Estimating the Impact of Fiscal Policy on Inequality and Poverty}. Brookings Institution Press and CEQ Institute, Tulane University. {p_end}